Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

September 14, CIA Chief Petraeus Tells Congress Benghazi Attack Started As Movie Protest
Pat Dollard ^ | 10/17/2012 | Pat Dollard

Posted on 10/26/2012 8:19:12 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender

The attack that killed four Americans in the Libyan consulate began as a spontaneous protest against the film “The Innocence of Muslims,” but Islamic militants who may have links to Al Qaeda used the opportunity to launch an attack, CIA Director David Petreaus told the House Intelligence Committee today according to one lawmaker who attended a closed-door briefing.

Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intel committee, said Petraeus laid out “a chronological order exactly what we felt happened, how it happened, and where we’re going in the future.”

“In the Benghazi area, in the beginning we feel that it was spontaneous – the protest- because it went on for two or three hours, which is very relevant because if it was something that was planned, then they could have come and attacked right away,” Ruppersberger, D-Md., said following the hour-long briefing by Petraeus. “At this point it looks as if there was a spontaneous situation that occurred and that as a result of that, the extreme groups that were probably connected to al Qaeda took advantage of that situation and then the attack started.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazicoverup; benghazirescue; benghazistanddown; ciabenghazi; petraeus; petraeusvideo; shadowwars; threatmatrix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
If Petraeus is an honorable man, he will resign now. He has stated today that the CIA in no way stopped CIA agents on the scene in Benghazi from protecting fellow Americans. But if this is true, then somebody else did order them to stand down and Petraeus needs to name names after he has resigned. He also need to explain why he spouted the administration line on the video causing the Benghazi attack when he had to have known that talking point was utterly false.
1 posted on 10/26/2012 8:19:16 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Are you allowed to criticize him around here yet? He’s always struck me as a “yes man”.


2 posted on 10/26/2012 8:26:58 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Democracy = Communism on the installment plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Are you allowed to criticize him around here yet? He’s always struck me as a “yes man”.


3 posted on 10/26/2012 8:27:13 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Democracy = Communism on the installment plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

“If Petraeus is an honorable man”

That’s a big “IF” as I see it! You just have to wonder if there are any honorable men left in the flag ranks of our military. If Petraeus was a decent human being, he would never have agreed to work for FUBO in the first place.


4 posted on 10/26/2012 8:28:10 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

petraeus is NOT an honorable man...and hasn’t been for many years.


5 posted on 10/26/2012 8:31:59 PM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

Are you allowed to criticize him around here yet?
+++++++++++++++
Well I’ve been doing it for two weeks or more. I have a few bruises but I’m still standing.


6 posted on 10/26/2012 8:35:01 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
Wonder if he also explained why after a 5hr gun battle between one of his operatives Tyrone Woods and the terrorists they never sent in re-enforcements to help him.

Instead they had our special forces in Italy which were less than 2hrs away sit on their bayonet's and do nothing.

They should all resign.

7 posted on 10/26/2012 8:35:39 PM PDT by Palin_Rubio2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

“You certainly won’t need to flush twice to get YOUR political career all way down the drain now will ‘ya Davey?”
/s
Thought we had an opportunity with this General, but then, most Generals are just politicians afterall.


8 posted on 10/26/2012 8:36:00 PM PDT by Macoozie (1) Win the Senate 2) Repeal Obamacare 3) Impeach Roberts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Patraeus stands with the most accomlished murderer in American history. Where does one think that leaves him?


9 posted on 10/26/2012 8:37:58 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

The video idea came from state.

Check their press releases.

The reports from the street in Egypt (supposed spillover) origin, never made any mention of a video, until the US STATE DEPT made their press release.


10 posted on 10/26/2012 8:41:22 PM PDT by Zeneta (Why are so many people searching for something that has already found us ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

He enthusiastically supports rules that deny first class fire support in afghanistan. This isn’t the first time he has left some poor SOBs behind a machine gun to slug it out when arty or air is available.

I’ve never understood the cult that likes him. And now he is lying to us. He knows the whole story of who denied what, when, why, and probably their exact words. Yet, he continues this kibuki dance of “CIA didn’t deny” without telling the real story. If Obama refused it, be a man and say so. Accept the end of your career or any criminal charges. It’s less of a price than those SEALS paid.

The coward needs to tell the straight up truth. He swore an oath to the constitution, not to the Fuhrer. A half truth like he gives us is nothing but a FULL lie. He may not have given the order, but he pushed the Obama video lie.

If the video cover story would have worked, he wouldn;t be saying a word right now. Lying SOB.


11 posted on 10/26/2012 8:41:35 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

Me too and became a sympathizer, prolly reads his Koran every night before bed,

http://loganswarning.com/2011/04/06/pentagon-channel-general-petraeus-bows-to-islam/


12 posted on 10/26/2012 8:42:09 PM PDT by Sophia777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

I have to agree. He seemed way to pliable n troop numbers


13 posted on 10/26/2012 8:43:14 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Agreed.... lack of integrity + head of CIA = not a good combo. He should resign.


14 posted on 10/26/2012 8:45:20 PM PDT by Sleeping Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
I'm starting to get context on Biden reported crude "got balls" comment to the father on one the Seals that died...

The report is that the Seals were order to stand down three times then final wen on their own against orders

I get the impress that Biden " got balls" comment was not some crude praise..

But that " got balls" was that the WH & Biden was pissed off at the Seals for not follow WH orders to stand back and watch Americas die

15 posted on 10/26/2012 8:45:33 PM PDT by tophat9000 (American is Barack Oaken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

The person you may not criticize or countermand is 0bama. Had Petraeus gone off the reservation then, he would have been relieved of command....and who knows how many CIA assets and agents would have been blown by now?

Yes, he did this.

What happens if Petraeus is silenced? Relieved of duty? At this level of government? While at ‘war’ with State? Panetta? 0bama?


16 posted on 10/26/2012 8:46:57 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

Either way Biden has no business in the VP job.


17 posted on 10/26/2012 8:47:54 PM PDT by Sleeping Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
What happens if Petraeus is silenced?

Silenced from doing what? Telling lies? Like the Benghazi attack was caused by a video? Or implying he doesn't know who ordered CIA agents to stand down when fellow Americans were under attack?

18 posted on 10/26/2012 8:51:28 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

In 11 days, I suspect the folks on the “reservation” will see the wagons forming a circle.

The opportunity to burn your ship and stand your ground is slipping away very fast.


19 posted on 10/26/2012 8:52:16 PM PDT by Zeneta (Why are so many people searching for something that has already found us ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Obama and his minions like Jarrett are indeed the problem. But until someone of stature is willing to stand up and tell the utter unvarnished truth without regard to his own well being, it will never stop.
Undoubtedly someone KNOWS and can prove why Obama is hiding his BC, passport and school records.
Someone KNOWS and can prove that Fast and Furious was designed to allow him to attack the 2nd amendment with the UN small arms treaty and a new assault rifle ban.

Like the Dreyfuss affair in France, until the “I Accuse” editorial in the paper laid out the cold hard facts, it remained buried.

Too many powerful people in this country (many allegedly on our side) are WORSE than Obama. They could utterly expose and destroy him. But they care more about their career than our nation. Some PFC who dies an unknown death is more of a man than Petreaus, McChrystol, etc.

Time for our “leaders” to stand up and be counted. Lives?
Fortunes? Sacred Honor?
He and those who protect Obama arent worthy to walk the streets our founders did.


20 posted on 10/26/2012 9:03:13 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
That is exactly what I summized today and posted on another thread.

1.They were ordered to stand down, they didn't.

2. Biden makes that crude remark at the memorial service.

THEN how is it that Joe Biden knew that Tyrone Woods did such a brave "ballsy" thing, and defy direct orders to stand down?

They knew, because they saw it all happen that very night.

21 posted on 10/26/2012 9:05:11 PM PDT by annieokie (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Silenced as in ordered to do thus and so by POTUS himself. Director of the CIA is a political appointment.


22 posted on 10/26/2012 9:06:16 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Disobey the illegal order that is a political coverup. Go to the steps of the capitol and lay out the whole, unvarnished, treasonous story.
Be sure to include that HE lied when he testified that the video caused this. Say who told him that was the official lie they were going with and who ordered him to advance it.
Bring proof that you as CIA director have.

Trust the nation to protect you, and to reward your honesty.

Lives,
Fortunes,
Sacred Honor.


23 posted on 10/26/2012 9:10:49 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: DesertRhino

Interesting that you mention Dreyfus’ “J’Accuse.” It has been on my mind for weeks.

Here we are, you and me, typing on a board someplace in cyberspace, and maybe a couple of people read this. We don’t have bodyguards or food tasters. We don’t ride heavy or live in absolute security.

People in the present government can simply kill us at will...a crash, a mugger, a heart attack. So sad. A pity, really.

Only as I get older do I understand well that my parents’ generation really did understand that America could cease to exist and might need everyone’s lives. Here, we’ve lived in safety, and now, we have jackals at the top, human vipers with white teeth that hide their evil intent...which looks to charge us every drop of blood we have, and more.

Sometimes, I think I would not miss DC or the East/West Coasts much.


25 posted on 10/26/2012 9:16:26 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“The coward needs to tell the straight up truth.”

Well said, sir! They are all cowards, quislings and poltroons of the basest stripe. Dempsey, Ham, Pannetta, Clinton, Biden, and Obama - all of them

I vote NO CONFIDENCE in the lot. A pox on all their houses. They are all without honor.

I have NEVER been so ashamed of the military leadership (at least since the DADT repeal...), or of the so-called leadership of this great country.


26 posted on 10/26/2012 9:17:25 PM PDT by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
Silenced as in ordered to do thus and so by POTUS himself.

If you are ordered to go before Congress and lie, then you have both a Constitutional and moral duty to resign rather than commit a crime like that.

27 posted on 10/26/2012 9:18:18 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intel committee, said Petraeus laid out “a chronological order..."

“In the Benghazi area, in the beginning we feel that it was spontaneous...,” Ruppersberger, D-Md., said following the hour-long briefing by Petraeus.

It's a second hand account by a leftist rat of what Petraeus said.

28 posted on 10/26/2012 9:20:58 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
“In the Benghazi area, in the beginning we feel that it was spontaneous – the protest- because it went on for two or three hours, ...

So, the guy on the phone who was at the consulate telling you they were being attacked by a large force of well-armed attackers couldn't convince you otherwise? You think they triggered a Critical Incident Report for a spontaneous protest?

29 posted on 10/26/2012 9:26:46 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

It’s obvious now that Patraeus knew he was telling a whopper that day. How often do these people lie to us? All we know is that they got caught this time....


30 posted on 10/26/2012 9:29:44 PM PDT by uncitizen (Treason is the Reason for the Season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

This article doesn’t quote what Petraeus actually said, but rather it quotes a Democrat Congressman’s claim of what Petraeus said in a closed door briefing. It is possible this Dem was just lying to keep the Obama story going. Not that I want to defend Petraeus, but I also am reticent to believe any Democrat trying to advance a lie. Time will tell...


31 posted on 10/26/2012 9:30:24 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo (Support hate crime laws: Because some victims are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

So now he is really General Betrayus!


32 posted on 10/26/2012 9:32:07 PM PDT by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants
It's a second hand account by a leftist rat of what Petraeus said.

First, it is a first-hand account. Ruppersberger saw Petraeus say it - that makes him an eyewitness.

Second, I guess I missed the CIA press release where Petraeus denied that he blamed the attack on the video. Petraeus is quick to send out press releases when he is covering his fanny - like today. So where was the press release where he denied blaming the Benghazi attack on the video?

33 posted on 10/26/2012 9:36:41 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew

Someone on another thread said, “This is why our founders put in the Constitution the requirement for President that he be a natural born citizen.” Americans would be less likely to disregard fidelity to their fellow-American. Such loyality would not be transfered transnationally. I must wonder now.


34 posted on 10/26/2012 9:37:11 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

It is up to us to determine why the Obama Administration has chosen to Cover Up what happened in Benghazi.

What are they trying in vain to hide?

The longer Secretary of Statements Hilly takes to “get to the bottom of this,” the more obvious it is that the Benghazi Cover Up was hastily designed to hide a VERY BIG US SECRET TOPIC.

My guess is that the CIA had discovered that some of the 20,000 Libyan Missiles were found in the possession of Ansar al-Sharia, or al-Qaeda who were then shipping the missing Missiles to Syria, and Obama knew all about it.

Can Hilly and Billy keep this a secret until after November 6, 2012?

Their lives just might depend on it - - - .

Meanwhile, Obama and Biden have lied to the American People, as well as their key officials have repeatedly lied to us.

The White House Benghazi Cover Up had closed ranks behind their boss, Obama.

Could Obama have survived the November Election with the embarrassment of a resurgent al-Qaeda in Libya?

Possibly, IF he would have told the truth at his first public announcement, and rallied Americans to “not change horses in the middle of the stream,” etc. etc., etc.

No way in Hell, now that Obama has lied about Benghazi.


35 posted on 10/26/2012 9:43:07 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Double Fail.

First, it was foolish to think that the Benghazi attack was anything other than a pre-planned, well-organized attack. Those thinking otherwise let their limited perspective overwhelm their common sense.

Second, Petraeus’ doctrine of soft-warfare is a losing strategy that prolongs military conflicts and causes our troops to be in more peril than they ought to be in. All you have to do is look at the so-called “insider” attacks and the manifest failure of our Afghanistan occupation to see how that strategy is really stupid.

I hope that Petraeus is dismissed from his current position when Romney takes office and that his whole counter-insurgency doctrine is ripped to shreds after being critically re-examined from top to bottom.


36 posted on 10/26/2012 9:43:23 PM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

[ If Petraeus is an honorable man, he will resign now. ]

He’s probably not honorable.. else why did Zero select him?..
He slimed his name once accepted a position from Zero..

He may even be stupid.. ignorant of what Zero “IS”..
MAybe willfully ignorant.. if so he was always corrupt..

Like Colin Bowell.. another high level military abortion..
Washington D.C. is absolutely full of corrupt malefactors..
MANY are republicans...


37 posted on 10/26/2012 10:04:00 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

It’s even bigger, justice helped spring the man identified as the leader of this group that organized this attack. Here is the info on the people in justice I posted a month ago. This Terrorist was sent to a Libyan prison and someone helped him get released in the beginning of the uprising and who helped him overthrow the regime. They created and supplied this group with heavy weapons. Some of these weapons may have been used to conduct this attack. Just my educated guess.

Here are the players, it goes deeper then CIA,State and DOD. If you look at the released classified itinerary of Stevens he was meeting with the only shipping company that Controled all the Libyan ports.

Follow the trail from Holder and his staff to Gitmo terror subject who was sprung in 2007 by Jennifer Daskal who is currently working in Justice. Does she still have his phone number? What would be the blow back if a person trusted in Justice directly helped the killer of our ambassador?

http://www.thedaily.com/article/2012/09/20/092012-news-libya-attack/

DOJ Lawyers Who Represented Terrorism Suspects Detainees Are Identified
Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010
Fox News has identified the seven anonymous Justice Department lawyers who previously represented Guantánamo detainees or terrorism suspects.
Justice Department spokesman Matthew A. Miller confirmed the names to Fox News’ Mike Levine, but did not say whether any of the seven previously anonymous lawyers now work on issues related to Guantánamo detainees.
“Each of the nine people referenced in the letter filed legal briefs that are available by using something as simple as Google,” Miller told Fox News. “We will not participate in an attempt to drag people’s names through the mud for political purposes.”
Miller said “politics has overtaken facts and reality” in the battle over the lawyers’ identities. (Full statement below)
The current Justice Department employees who previously represented Guantánamo detainees or terrorism suspects are:
·         Tony West, the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division.
·         Jonathan Cedarbaum, of the Office of Legal Counsel.
·         Eric Columbus, senior counsel in the Office of the Deputy Attorney General.
·         Karl Thompson, of the Office of Legal Counsel.
·         Joseph Guerra, Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General.
·         Tali Farhadian, an official in the Office of the Attorney General.
·         Beth Brinkmann, Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Division.
Two other DOJ lawyers — Principal Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal and National Security Division Attorney Jennifer Daskal – also formerly represented detainees, but their identities had already been known.
In response to the DOJ confirmation, Keep America Safe spokesman Aaron Harison said the organization still wants information on which of the lawyers works on detainee issues within the DOJ.
“The American people have a right to know whether lawyers who voluntarily flocked to Guantanamo to take up the cause of the terrorists are currently working on detainee issues in President Obama’s Justice Department,” Harison said. (Full statement below)
Details about the DOJ lawyers’ involvement in Guantánamo detainee cases are available in the article, which also points out that the Justice Department hired several lawyers who represented Guantánamo detainees during the George W. 

Holder’s former firm, Covington & Burling represented 14 Gitmo detainees. Still looking to see which ones:
“Guantanamo Bay Detainees
We currently represent fourteen men detained at the United States Naval Station at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Most of the men have been detained for approximately eight years and none have been charged with any crimes. Following the decision by the Supreme Court in Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008), holding that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus extends to detainees held at Guantánamo Bay, we are challenging the legality of our clients’ detentions in habeas proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Of the seven cases that have gone to merits hearings thus far, Covington has won four, lost two, and is awaiting a decision in one other. Two prior clients were released without a hearing.
The firm has been involved in the Guantánamo related litigation for the last six years. In addition to the on-going habeas corpus proceedings, our efforts have included: bringing cases for review of enemy combatant classification decisions in the D.C. Circuit under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005; challenging the destruction of CIA torture tapes in federal court; filing amicus briefs and coordinating the amicus effort in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006); filing amicus briefs in support of Supreme Court review in Moussaoui v. United States, 382 F.3d 483 (4th Cir.), cert denied, 544 U.S. 931 (2005); challenging the government’s practice of redacting information from documents given to security-cleared habeas counsel; and challenging the abusive medical and living conditions that the detainees experience at Guantánamo.”
http://www.cov.com/probonooverview/probono.aspx?show=morehighlights
I believe the CCR represented him. The CCR has strong ties to Covington & Burling:
“And then there is the Center for Constitutional Rights, a Marxist organization that for years has coordinated legal representation for terrorists detained at Guantanamo Bay. The CCR has been attempting to convince Germany, France, Spain, and other countries to file war-crime indictments against former Bush administration officials, including President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and Secretary Rumsfeld. In representing America’s enemies, CCR has collaborated with many private lawyers, who also volunteered their services — several of whom are now working in the Obama Justice Department. Indeed, Holder’s former firm boasts that it still represents 16 Gitmo detainees (the number was previously higher). And, for help shaping detainee policy, Holder recently hired Jennifer Daskal for DOJ’s National Security Division — a lawyer from Human Rights Watch with no prior prosecutorial experience, whose main qualification seems to be the startling advocacy she has done for enemy combatants
 
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/228146/eric-holders-hidden-agenda/andrew-c-mccarthy
Jennifer Daskal
Jennifer Daskal is an American lawyer who serves as senior counsel for Human Rights Watch, and focuses on issues of terrorism, criminal law and immigration.[1][2] She is also currently a political hire at the Department of Justice, which is seeking to prosecute terror suspects through the criminal justice system instead of through military tribunals.[3][4]
A graduate of Harvard Law School, Cambridge and Brown University and a Marshall Scholar,[5] Daskal garnered attention after traveling to the countries to which Guantanamo captives have been released, to verify that those countries are abiding by the undertakings they made to the US Government to respect the returned captives’ human rights.[6]
On February 23, 2010, the New York Post reported that Daskal, Neal Katyal, and three other lawyers who had worked on behalf of the civil rights of Guantanamo captives, had been serving on the Obama administration’s task force reviewing the status of the remaining Guantanamo captives.[7] The paper had first questioned her appointment to the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, in July 2009, and then again in January 2010


38 posted on 10/26/2012 10:25:20 PM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Petraeus needs to come clean, or forever suffer a horrible stain on his record.He will never be trusted by America ever again, and history will adjudge him as a supporter of a fascist president.


39 posted on 10/26/2012 11:38:02 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

CIA Director David Betrayus


40 posted on 10/26/2012 11:46:08 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Countdown to 11-06-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98

I agree and say it in bold letters in Post #40.


41 posted on 10/26/2012 11:50:12 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Countdown to 11-06-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

I had the same feeling, except it seemed as though he was telegraphing they had explicitly controlled the final fate of Tyrone Woods, and not simply by telling him to stand down.

Seemed more of a veiled threat, like “we know where you live” -type of remark. A threat or insult with plausible deniability.

It sure wasn’t the type of comment to me made in that circumstance to grieving family members.


42 posted on 10/27/2012 12:02:43 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

One of the few things that make sense.

IOW, in this CT,...it was a preplanned attack,...movements of resources though took longer than several hours.

What was their objective?

The Ambassador?
The MANPADS?
Interruption of a shipping transaction?

How far in advance was the Ambassador’s meeting scheduled with the Turkish envoy?

Did something go on in that meeting, which might have been listened to by others, become a decision point, redirecting the objectives of the attacker’s leadership?

Actions, inactions and timing of the mortar assault on the Annex indicates the militants were obeying real time orders from outside the on site command.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

IMHO, both sides were being controlled by this Administration, but perhaps they are Black ops inside Black Ops, where they demand centralized command and centralized control. They were working towards controlling major worldwide terror networks and the MANPADS were valuable resources, at least for the next few years, regardless who wins the election.

The Ambassador’s disappearance was the ‘fog of war’ element, coupled with the ‘rogue ex-SEAL contractor’ obeying centralized command, decentralized control methods of operation became a distraction for their preplanned BlackOp, when he disobeyed perceptibly illegal orders.

The real damage to US security is that by this Administration covering it up, they have exposed their true ways of corrupt thinking. Our adversaries can now read Obama and the Administration like a book, forecasting their decisions, willpower and volition. Now the US can be easily outmaneuvered in this window of vulnerability between now and the Administration’s removal.

(Then again, maybe they were just upset by the video and act irrationally...)/CT


43 posted on 10/27/2012 12:45:51 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks vbmoneyspender, beware of meme-building and blame shifting:
44 posted on 10/27/2012 2:51:54 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

the first job of a CIA chief is that the CIA never takes ANYONE’s words at face value

get the intel first before believing anyone

and the idea that the Bengazi incident began as a protest over the stupid video, did not come from intel

it was the story the organizers (who set up the protest as cover) put out

so, my guess is that leading up to September 11 the CIA “actionable” intelligence was poor, and by September 24 Patreaus went to Congress to repeat the party line, not betray all he really knew (IT WAS terrorists and terrorists organized) soon after the attack was over

now, as of today, he and Clinton and Panetta and Obama are all pointing fingers at each other


45 posted on 10/27/2012 11:44:34 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
it was the story the organizers (who set up the protest as cover) put out

The protest was in Egypt. There was no protest in Benghazi - only an attack - in which 4 Americans died.

46 posted on 10/27/2012 12:01:30 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
The protest was in Egypt.

And it had nothing to do with the now-famous video, either.

The crowd was chanting "Obama, we are all Osamas now!"

"The Innocence of Muslims" warranted not a single mention...

47 posted on 10/27/2012 12:07:48 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

you’re preaching to the choir


48 posted on 10/28/2012 8:02:30 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender; All

Why should we believe Democrat Representative Ruppersberger’s take on this. Just because Rupersberger is claiming it does not mean that it is so.

Petraeus cannot defend himself on this because it was a closed briefing.


49 posted on 10/28/2012 8:05:24 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
If the Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee publicly states that Petraeus said one thing and Petraeus didn't say that, he can easily come out and say he didn't say that. Indeed given the circumstances, he would have an obligation to do so so that his fellow citizens do not remain misinformed about an event of national significance.

Beyond that, Petraeus has already issued a press release denying that the CIA stopped help from going to the Americans who were under attack in Benghazi. If the Democratic representative is lying about Petraeus' position on the video causing the 'demonstration' at Benghazi then he has an obligation to rebut that misinformation just like he did on the reports about the CIA being ordered to stand down.

50 posted on 10/28/2012 8:20:32 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson