Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb
Other rapid response units that could have gotten there would have been too little and too late.

Don't buy that premise.

TRANSCRIPT: Presidential debate on foreign policy at Lynn University
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/22/transcript-presidential-debate-on-foreign-policy-at-lynn-university/

Obama “Now with respect to Libya, as I indicated in the last debate, when we received that phone call, I immediately made sure that, number one, that we did everything we could to secure those Americans who were still in harm’s way;”

17 posted on 10/28/2012 9:05:58 AM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Son House

“that we did everything we could to secure those Americans who were still in harm’s way”

“everything we could” Exactly my point, CIA operators were all that we could do, given the unshaped and rapidly evolving battlefield there.

We have a number of rapid response units worldwide, some are more quickly deployed than others, largely depending on air assets for deployment, ground support, and overwatch.

We had three units deployed that were tactically capable of relieving the Benghazi mission. However, two were committed to relief of the embassies in Cairo and Khartoum and the third committed to AfPak.

We were stretched too thin. Africom wanted to send the unit staged for Khartoum but was denied, hence General Ham’s disagreements.


28 posted on 10/28/2012 9:20:33 AM PDT by gandalftb (The art of diplomacy says "nice doggie", until you find a bigger rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson