Posted on 10/28/2012 11:53:47 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Suppose Obama wins and then the truth of the matter dawns on the public at large. Does Obama think he can then still govern? Maybe by more than ever ruling by executive orders. He will then be outside the Cobstitution, but I doubt her cares. The House will still be Republican, and so I guess must treat Obama as the House of Commons treated Charles I. Something like civil war would ensue. And there are, what two hundred million guns in this country. May sound melodramatic, but we are in new territory here.
I had forgotten about Cindy and her “absolute moral authority” (I think that was Maureen Dowd). Funny how some things only work against Republican presidents and not Democrat presidents...
I believe that the press, by acting to blatantly promote 0bambi, is depriving each and every one of us our First Amendment rights. Freedom of the press is NOT just for those in the media. It is a right for ALL people.
the Arab-Kenyan Barack Hussein Obama II, (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) as U.S. Ambassador to Libya,
After a few days people are not really going to be interested in a New York story (I will be, but that’s just because).
They’ll be tapping into new news sources.
Some guy in mid Ohio is not going to change a vote because BO is helping NYers.
In Penn., there are more broke glass repubs than hurricaine dems, I’d imagine.
All the other affected states are solid blue x NH
Lack of Strike Force Impeded Benghazi Response "As U.S. Africa Command waited for any order to rescue Americans on Sept. 11 at the besieged consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, it was missing a key unit that the Pentagon gives every regional four-star commander — an emergency strike force.
The new command’s lack of such a unit is another piece in the unfolding Benghazi timeline that shows an overriding theme: As radical Islamic extremism swelled in the chaotic coastal city, U.S. security assets in Libya diminished................."
Video: Pat Caddell lets loose!
Between now and the election Obama must be made to
tell as many more lies as possible. Why? Because if he
does win his statements will be part of the public record
which can be used against him when the sh*t finally hits
the fan. Only Romney can make this happen by continually
challenging Obama to come clean with the truth. No in-
vestigation is necessary to compel Obama to explain the
lies surrounding his administration both during and after
the attack. Sadly Romney is not doing his duty.
Thanks. I watched it on fox news.
Charlene Lamb refused (”denied or ignored”) to extend the security Strike Force.
________________________
“......The colonel and Mr. Nordstrom were fighting a long-distance battle of emails and phone calls with the State Department to maintain a large security presence.
But Charlene Lamb, who was in charge of international programs for the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security, rejected their requests. State wanted to create a picture of normal operations in Libya......”
Read more: Lack of strike force impeded Benghazi response - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/28/lack-of-strike-force-impeded-benghazi-response/#ixzz2AfsQ2tDs
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.