This is getting rather old with you only willing to ask questions, but not answer them.
My position is pretty clear by now, and if you can’t deduce the answer to identical questions from the previous iterations we’re going to be here all week.
But to address your first paragraph, because they were all racist at the time, no such law could ever have been passed or enforced so it’s pretty moot. You might want to look into Reconstruction and what a debacle it was.
I’ll just have to assume you’re OK with a Catholic having to host gay wedding receptions since you’re so focused on dodging an answer.
Then I would have to assume you were OK with no dogs or Irish, discrimination against Catholics and blacks having to ride in the baggage cars based on the same logic.
Do you think being treated as a second class citizen in access to public accomodations (hotels trains restaurants etc) is compatible with the guaranteed right to liberty?
Then I would have to assume you were OK with no dogs or Irish, discrimination against Catholics and blacks having to ride in the baggage cars based on the same logic.
Do you think being treated as a second class citizen in access to public accomodations (hotels trains restaurants etc) is compatible with the guaranteed right to liberty?