Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shock to Obama Camp: Gallup finds early voters favor Romney 52-47%
American Thinker ^ | 10/30/2012 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 10/30/2012 2:30:53 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The Gallup Organization has some very bad news for the Obama camp, but is being discreet about it, entombing it at the bottom of an article innocuously titled "In U.S., 15% of Registered Voters Have Already Cast Ballots."

Given the apparent intimidation of Gallup by the Department of Justice, it is only prudent to once again bury the lede. But that does not make the news any less painful for Obamaites, who have been counting on a supposed ground game and early voting advantage.

John Nolte of Breitbart has no such compunctions about delivering the bad news from Gallup:

Romney currently leads Obama 52% to 45% among voters who say they have already cast their ballots. However, that is comparable to Romney's 51% to 46% lead among all likely voters in Gallup's Oct. 22-28 tracking polling. At the same time, the race is tied at 49% among those who have not yet voted but still intend to vote early, suggesting these voters could cause the race to tighten. However, Romney leads 51% to 45% among the much larger group of voters who plan to vote on Election Day, Nov. 6. When Gallup says early voters don't seem to be swaying the election, presumably what they means is that because Romney is ahead by five points nationally, an early voting advantage of seven-points isn't going to "sway the election."

Romney's early voting lead in Gallup may not jive with the CorruptMedia narrative, but it does with actual early vote totals that have been released and show Romney's early vote totals either beating Obama in swing states such as Colorado and Florida or chipping away at the President's advantage in the others.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gallup; obama; romney

1 posted on 10/30/2012 2:30:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I have a dream!

Photobucket

2 posted on 10/30/2012 2:41:24 PM PDT by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plangent

I don’t think your dream is too far off. It is going to be a blow-out - but, by that much? Maybe just not much!


3 posted on 10/30/2012 2:45:00 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What did Obama’s DOJ do to to Gallup or whomever this is?


4 posted on 10/30/2012 2:51:47 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (I will never vote for Romney. Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

That is a great map. And accurate. Blue areas are:
minorities, liberals, academics, union thugs, and welfare queens. Yup. That’s about it.


5 posted on 10/30/2012 2:53:32 PM PDT by Galtoid ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
About a dozen people at the Election Board today when I went to pick up my ballot. No way of knowing their Party registration, of course, but obviously people are worked up about this election.
6 posted on 10/30/2012 3:06:04 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney ( New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plangent

This article raised some real concerns for me about percentages of voters in certain areas of Ohio, who have already voted. The author throws out the numbers that seem too high, as if they must be wrong. I wouldn’t be so hasty, unless someone can prove that these ballots did not come from legally registered voters, who are still living and breathing.

In Philadelphia in 2000, Al Gore garnered about 100% of the registered voters, George Bush got 19% of the registered voters. That makes the total about 120% of the registered voters voted in Philadelphia. More votes were cast in Philadelphia in that election than there were people of legal voting age in Philadelphia.


7 posted on 10/30/2012 3:14:55 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dems are not worried. Their voters vote both early AND often.


8 posted on 10/30/2012 3:21:59 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s amazing. For this article, I’ve seen 52-45, 52-46 and now 52-47 in the headline.

But if you read the actual numbers from Gallup, it’s 52-46. Some people must need reading glasses.


9 posted on 10/30/2012 4:29:03 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Der’s dat awful number 47 again!

Dang, was Romney right, or what?


10 posted on 10/30/2012 8:30:47 PM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson