Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

Wise up. Romney is infinitely better than the scum in the White Hut and you don’t look real good by trying to equate the two.


15 posted on 10/31/2012 10:27:35 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob; OneWingedShark

Those posts are just plain silly, an inaminate object would be better than what in office now.
Just in terms of corporate investing for example; news of the election of a pro business president will spur private sector investment. What a silly comment to make 5 days out, what’s he going to do, stay home?


20 posted on 10/31/2012 10:51:45 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Barack Hussein Obama, what American would elect a guy with that name less than 10 years after 9-11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
cardinal4:
Those posts are just plain silly, an inaminate object would be better than what in office now.
Just in terms of corporate investing for example; news of the election of a pro business president will spur private sector investment. What a silly comment to make 5 days out, what’s he going to do, stay home?

I didn't say that. But I honestly think that a vote for Romney is not good. (I'll concede that a vote for Obama may be worse; I will not concede that a 3rd party vote is useless.)

IMO, People thinking "Romney will save us" are fools, in the very literal sense of having been fooled. (I'll admit, it's my opinion and I may well be wrong; but you have to admit that a lot of people are setting themselves up for disappointment, especially with the "he'll repeal Obamacare.")


bigbob:
Wise up. Romney is infinitely better than the scum in the White Hut and you don’t look real good by trying to equate the two.

Look, the "Romney will repeal..." line is horrid: if he does repeal anything (Executive Orders are 'rescinded') then he will be further degrading the fundamental purpose of our Constitution (separating powers) just like Obama, if he does not then he's a "major disappointment to his supporters" just like Obama.

The "Romney will save our country because of budgeting" again suffers the same problem: Congress is the body that is to do the budgeting.

The "Romney is a businessman so he must be good for business" is ridiculous on its face: given that power corrupts, why should we expect a businessman not to play political games with businesses (which is what Obama's admin does)? Why should "being a businessman" be proof against implementing crony capitalism, or fascism?

Why should I accept his "pro-life" label as valid if he supports the very exceptions that devalue innocent lives, condemning them to death for nothing they did?

The Supreme Court argument is just as vacuous, considering the types of judges Romney has appointed.

Why in God's good name should I accept an "our scum is better than their scum" type argument?


You degrade my intelligence, belittle my conscious, and refuse to hear any warning at all.

25 posted on 10/31/2012 11:30:17 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson