Sounds 100% Plausible. Wouldn’t put anything past Bath House Barry
Very often an indication of crackpottery.
Why else would a representative of the MB visit the WH over and over again over the last year?......
ping
As long as you didn’t get it from Facebook...
Since according to our Secretary of State “Facebook is not a valid place to find facts” but youtube is...
And for some strange reason, which I read on another article, a drone was dispatched to cover the area before the attack took place.
What could possibly go wrong!
Yes! Allowing radical muzzies to kidnap Stevens would've given 0bama cover for fulfilling his promise to release the terrorist blind sheik in a trade. This was part of his radical agenda. Never mind about the other Americans in the compound who might be killed in the process. What the traitor 0bama didn't count on was the heroic intervention by two AMERICAN PATRIOTS, the SEALS.
By the way: what ever happened to the policy of not negotiating with terrorists?
I never understood how it wold have worked as a botched kidnapping until I saw this video. I believe that this is the most likely scenario.
I don’t understand the point of posting such crazy stuff
Who needs an email to figure this one out?
I posted this hypothesis on a similar thread last night:
In the absence of answers from the White House, people will begin speculating.
I myself cannot think of any reason why someone would lower security and then flat out deny military assistance in a situation where threats of violence are occurring... especially on the anniversary of 911 weeks before a presidential election UNLESS... this was far more than incompetence and more like an orchestrated October surprise.
A caller in to Hannity today made a very good observation that Hannity really didn’t pick up on very well.
These bozos in the white house were watching real time the events that were unfolding as these Navy Seals were requesting permission to go in and assist when they were told to stand down.
This means that observers in the white house were not content to just watch 4-5 servicemen and an ambassador be killed... they were prepared to watch at least 30 people be killed or ABDUCTED.... and the 4-5 navy seals pretty much foiled whatever plans had been laid to create a situation that Obama could manipulate and resolve right before the election.
That’s right... I think Obama actually set this thing up.
And until he is willing and able to come forth with viable answers as to what happened and why, I must assume as a matter of speculation that he had a hand in orchestrating this attack at some level... most likely by proxy.
High treason is punishable by death.
Time for Obama to start answering questions... TRUTHFULLY! or like the birth certificate issue, it will never go away.
I’ll bet the DUmp is having fun seeing this one here in FR. I recommend against posting this kind of BS.
He's a sleazeball and a cheap bastard!!!!!
Scratch that.. I posted that in the wrong thread! I have two tabs up and meant to post that in the Bob Menendez thread.
"We may be paranoid but that doesn't mean we are wrong."
A much different theory from a reputatable source:
The nature of the Benghazi disaster is now clear. Ambassador Stevens was engaged in smuggling sizable quantities of Libyan arms from the destroyed Gaddafi regime to the Syrian rebels, to help overthrow the Assad regime in Syria. Smuggling arms to the so-called “Free Syrian Army” is itself a huge gamble, but Obama has been a gambler with human lives over the last four years, as shown by the tens of thousands of Arabs who have died in the so-called Arab Spring — which has brought nothing but disaster to the Arab world.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/benghazi_reveals_obama-islamist_alliance.html#ixzz2Az2aOwzs
I have heard this before, although it sounds plausible, I am unable to wrap my head around the theory.
Good grief. Then why didn’t they get him? 150 guys with mortars, Rocket Propelled Grenades and heavy machine guns can’t kidnap him? Come on. Why didn’t the “looters” just turn him over to the attackers? This keeps getting thrown out and it makes no sense except to distract people from the real issues.
First came out in “Lame Cherry” blog about a week ago.