Posted on 11/02/2012 5:43:48 AM PDT by xzins
Summary table A. Household data, seasonally adjusted [Numbers in thousands]
|
|||||
Category | Oct. 2011 |
Aug. 2012 |
Sept. 2012 |
Oct. 2012 |
Change from: Sept. 2012- Oct. 2012 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Employment status |
|||||
|
|||||
Civilian noninstitutional population |
240,269 | 243,566 | 243,772 | 243,983 | 211 |
|
|||||
Civilian labor force |
154,057 | 154,645 | 155,063 | 155,641 | 578 |
|
|||||
Participation rate |
64.1 | 63.5 | 63.6 | 63.8 | 0.2 |
|
|||||
Employed |
140,297 | 142,101 | 142,974 | 143,384 | 410 |
|
|||||
Employment-population ratio |
58.4 | 58.3 | 58.7 | 58.8 | 0.1 |
|
|||||
Unemployed |
13,759 | 12,544 | 12,088 | 12,258 | 170 |
|
|||||
Unemployment rate |
8.9 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 0.1 |
|
|||||
Not in labor force |
86,213 | 88,921 | 88,710 | 88,341 | -369 |
|
|||||
Unemployment rates |
|||||
|
|||||
Total, 16 years and over |
8.9 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 0.1 |
|
|||||
Adult men (20 years and over) |
8.7 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 0.0 |
|
|||||
Adult women (20 years and over) |
7.9 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 0.2 |
|
|||||
Teenagers (16 to 19 years) |
24.0 | 24.6 | 23.7 | 23.7 | 0.0 |
|
|||||
White |
8.0 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
|
|||||
Black or African American |
15.0 | 14.1 | 13.4 | 14.3 | 0.9 |
|
|||||
Asian (not seasonally adjusted) |
7.3 | 5.9 | 4.8 | 4.9 | - |
|
|||||
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity |
11.4 | 10.2 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 0.1 |
|
|||||
Total, 25 years and over |
7.7 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 0.0 |
|
|||||
Less than a high school diploma |
13.8 | 12.0 | 11.3 | 12.2 | 0.9 |
|
|||||
High school graduates, no college |
9.5 | 8.8 | 8.7 | 8.4 | -0.3 |
|
|||||
Some college or associate degree |
8.2 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.9 | 0.4 |
|
|||||
Bachelor's degree and higher |
4.4 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.8 | -0.3 |
|
|||||
Reason for unemployment |
|||||
|
|||||
Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs |
7,924 | 7,003 | 6,535 | 6,575 | 40 |
|
|||||
Job leavers |
1,068 | 942 | 957 | 1,010 | 53 |
|
|||||
Reentrants |
3,387 | 3,318 | 3,306 | 3,300 | -6 |
|
|||||
New entrants |
1,291 | 1,277 | 1,247 | 1,301 | 54 |
|
|||||
Duration of unemployment |
|||||
|
|||||
Less than 5 weeks |
2,676 | 2,844 | 2,542 | 2,632 | 90 |
|
|||||
5 to 14 weeks |
3,285 | 2,868 | 2,826 | 2,851 | 25 |
|
|||||
15 to 26 weeks |
2,029 | 1,845 | 1,860 | 1,836 | -24 |
|
|||||
27 weeks and over |
5,839 | 5,033 | 4,844 | 5,002 | 158 |
|
|||||
Employed persons at work part time |
|||||
|
|||||
Part time for economic reasons |
8,790 | 8,031 | 8,613 | 8,344 | -269 |
|
|||||
Slack work or business conditions |
5,839 | 5,217 | 5,523 | 5,219 | -304 |
|
|||||
Could only find part-time work |
2,538 | 2,507 | 2,572 | 2,614 | 42 |
|
|||||
Part time for noneconomic reasons |
18,401 | 18,996 | 18,736 | 18,923 | 187 |
|
|||||
Persons not in the labor force (not seasonally adjusted) |
|||||
|
|||||
Marginally attached to the labor force |
2,555 | 2,561 | 2,517 | 2,433 | - |
|
|||||
Discouraged workers |
967 | 844 | 802 | 813 | - |
| |||||
- Over-the-month changes are not displayed for not seasonally adjusted data. |
I have a couple of questions. Was last month’s data adjusted for the California unemployment numbers that were left out? Did California report this month?
Did the east coast states hit by Sandy report?
At this point the Obama people (and any agency under their control/influence) have shown so many times their willingness to give a rosy report whenever Obama needs to be bailed out - followed by an “adjustment” when the eyes are off the subject. As with everything else, the question is how this report may have distorted, manipulated, and hidden the truth. The same people who considered it fine to take out from Obama’s birth certificate the notations showing that it is actually legally non-valid cannot be trusted to handle details with integrity.
At this point if Obama yelled “fire” in a crowded theater, most people would just yawn and wonder what Obama was up to. He’s a pathological liar.
I was under the impression that they had incorporated California’s data, but I really don’t know.
I think the career civilians in the government are seeing that Obama might not get another term. I would think that would change the way they view his future ability to help them and/or protect them.
California wasn’t reported last month. I was joking this morning if California wasn’t reported this month, a household survey of near 3 million would get the unemployment rate below 7. The unemployment number is meaningless anymore - thanks to Obama. It is being used in conjunction with the oversampled polling to depress the Republican party vote.
Hopefully the Tea Party will be out in full force on election day, and we can figure out what the deal is with the household survey and the skewed polling in a Romney administration.
I think there will be a massive backlash against the MSM after the election - one way or the other. They are way out of control.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.