Such a revolution would by definition have to be anti-American.
“American,” if it means anything, means rule for, of and by the people.
Your revolution would by definition be of a minority (one with which I happen to agree) against the majority.
Breitbart was right. He who controls the culture rules. In the long run he will swing elections. With his death we lost the only person who seemed to understand how to fight their control of the culture. The greatest tragedy of this century, IMO.
Of course, the century is young, and those who now control the country and the world will have lots of chances to top it.
We would have the same support we had in our first Revolution. You do know most of the people wanted nothing to do with it don’t you? It would be the same now. A small percentage of the population will be all that’s willing to get involved personally regardless of whether they support or oppose it. They won’t be actively opposing anyone. You also forget that it doesn’t matter how much of the population disagrees with the Constitution, unless they change it the way it was meant to be changed their opinion on it means nothing. They can’t change it the right way, and don’t even bother with that process anymore. The fact is most Americans are ignorant on our Constitution, and everything this nation was built on. That’s why we are in this situation. Considering our second amendment was given to us to protect ourselves against a tyrannical government like we have now, there are still a ridiculous amount of people who believe it’s for hunting. That sadly includes many who support the right.
What I cannot understand, is those who wish to overpower the working class of people by retaining political power at any cost are going to do once the working class decides to give up and become part of the parasitic class that keeps them in power.And that WILL happen.
All the trade skills will be lost, the people who are keeping this kind of government in power aren’t skilled and dont want to work, for the most part.