To: ExxonPatrolUs
Maybe the banks don't need to have $380 trillion of derivatives in their portfolio...
2 posted on
11/08/2012 11:43:09 AM PST by
uncommonsense
(Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
To: ExxonPatrolUs
Better to them run wild and bail them out later, you betcha.
4 posted on
11/08/2012 12:19:52 PM PST by
Wolfie
To: ExxonPatrolUs
Give the banks two options - keep the derivatives and add the reserves, or unwind most of them and they won't need to add the reserves.
Plan C and D are probably what the banks are counting on instead - more QE and federal bailouts.
5 posted on
11/08/2012 12:20:57 PM PST by
dirtboy
To: ExxonPatrolUs
...derivatives, which are financial contracts that banks and investors use to bet on interest rates, stock prices, creditworthiness of corporations and the like. Would the term "casino economy" apply to what they're doing with these "bets?"
7 posted on
11/08/2012 1:34:54 PM PST by
Max in Utah
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: ExxonPatrolUs
...derivatives, which are financial contracts that banks and investors use to bet on interest rates, stock prices, creditworthiness of corporations and the like. Would the term "casino economy" apply to what they're doing with these "bets?"
8 posted on
11/08/2012 1:35:02 PM PST by
Max in Utah
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: ExxonPatrolUs
Obamanation Communism File.
9 posted on
11/08/2012 2:26:18 PM PST by
Graewoulf
((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson