You are, of course, absolutely correct.
There are simply too many things, objective, empirical things, that pointed to a Romney win for there not to be massive fraud involved.
Even the post-election stats aren’t making any sense. A D+11 election...with 10 million fewer votes for Obama, and a tighter popular vote margin than last time? If it was really D+11, the GOP should have lost the House BIG TIME, worse than in 2006.
Either math has stopped working the way it is supposed to, or else there was widespread electoral fraud in most of the major swing states.
The reason the HOUSE races didn’t change much, is because thousands upon thousands of stuffed ballots had only ‘Obama’ checked off and that’s all. It would be too time consuming to manufacture ballots with ALL races checked off, so ‘Obama only’ ballots were quickly produced.
Exactly.
And on the news last night the Obama campaign somewhat confirmed it.
They said that their strategy was not to expand the blue areas on the electoral map but to squeeze more votes out of them by "finding" more Obama voters in them ---- right ... finding more voters or creating them???
We need a breakdown by precinct in those areas where there were inordinate vote totals.
Either math has stopped working the way it is supposed to, or else there was widespread electoral fraud in most of the major swing states.
I don,t have any way to verify it.
They were counting on the MC Cain voters to vote for Romney, my take is that these uh what shall i say, God fearing people are more comfortable with queer marriage than they would be with a man having more than one wife.
“Either math has stopped working the way it is supposed to, or else there was widespread electoral fraud in most of the major swing states.”
Yes, this doesn’t really add up. I didn’t expect Romney to have a landslide, but I can’t believe that so many people found Obama acceptable after four years of worsening unemployment and inflation.