“Broadwell, who researched the book ‘All In’ for three years, had extensive access to Petraeus in Afghanistan.”
And apparently Petraeus had broad access to Broadwell.
If he had just stuck to BJ’s in the White House he would have been okay!
What we know is the people on the ground in Benghasia requested assistance. We know Patreus stated no one at CIA refused assistance, inferring that decision came from the POTUS. We know Patreus was to testify before Congress next week. He was possibly blackmailed to testify a certain way or else his skeletons would be revealed. He refused and outed himself to maintain some respect in a shameful situation. This ain’t over by a long shot.
Obama’s Chicago thugocracy probably has or creates dirt on
any official who has the potential to harm his majesty.
Big idiot Goofy pleasure for this!??
Idiot. Timing was planned. This explains why some of the people on our side are so weak..the operatives must have dirt on them..
Lord, where are the patriots and good men..
Good men stay away from the sluts and e-gay harmony.
-—— NBC News and Slate-—
So there you have it. A made up story put out by the official propaganda organs.
America is dead.
Perhaps he is a SUPER GENIUS - SUPER PATRIOT, that considered the potential future need for a plausible cover story to remove himself from a position of public accountability in order to SAVE THE REPUBLIC FROM A THREATENING TRUTH.
So, as a SUPER GENIUS - SUPER PATRIOT, he preemptively sacrificed everything he valued and dutifully made whoopie with a beautiful woman for a few years, paying “next-to-the-ultimate-price’ for his country.
Perhaps he did all this for us, without knowing for certain that his sacrifice would ever be necessary. /sarc
Seriously - I think this situation amplifies the importance of the biblical principle that leaders should strive to be above reproach...cause if they ain’t, there will be far-reaching repercussions.
Perhaps, in view of this, the Committee chairman should direct all questions to an empty chair.
So Madame Secretary Hillary Clinton is conveniently out of the country next week and won't be testifying before the Committee, either......
Perhaps, in view of this, the Committee chairman should direct all questions to another empty chair.
Perhaps the Committee chairman should invite Clint Eastwood to administer the oaths to the empty chairs before the questioning begins.
Leni
No one here really thinks that this corrupt administration suddenly cares about someone’s moral life.
It’s because he told the truth about Benghazi. It’s a blatant use of power.
The firing happened right after the election so it wouldn’t embarrass the corrupt chief.
The link seems to be dead, so I couldn’t read the source story. When did this “investigation” start? Obviously this was held back until after the election. The “e-mail hacking” sounds like an excuse to open a fishing and plumbing expedition. Why did they really want to get rid of him? Why now? What do they want him not to see or do? Was the girlfriend a backchannel?
My husband was in the army. He tells lots of storys of cheating going on by they officers and the officers wives. This is merely a distraction from what really went on in Benghazi so the pressure is off Obama
So, an obvious question comes to mind: If Petraeus (Director of the FBI) was forced to resign over an affair, why would not a sitting President (Clinton, for those libs who are still in denial) have been required to do the same???