Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: livius
Romney never had any intention of asking Petraeus to be his running mate. The evidence of this is that Romney's team went to such great lengths to ignore anything related to Afghanistan or the so-called "war on terror" from his campaign. Selecting Obama's CIA director as his running mate would have made something too obvious to voters: Both major parties are on the same side of almost every major issue in the U.S. today.
87 posted on 11/10/2012 1:35:36 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Well, that’s absolutely the truth. Both parties - or at least their leaders - are on the same side.

So therefore it would have been no problem for Romney to have picked Petraeus (who is as liberal as the day is long and was perfectly happy with Obama) as his running mate, and it was only the nagging feeling that he had to somehow pretend to be conservative that made him pick Ryan...who like Palin, was never allowed to say much of anything.

Ryan had actually wanted to go to some of our black ghetto areas and to a lot of Hispanic areas and make a pitch on economic and personal liberty, and he was shut down by Romney’s campaign.

I’m never voting for VP again.


122 posted on 11/10/2012 2:34:18 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson