Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Irenic
The guy went to a Republican not a Democrat, is that because it is his Rep? Or does that mean that somehow the Democrats couldn’t be trusted because it is something that the Democrats (administration) are involved with?

I will make a guess at your question. Liberals could care less what Petraeus was doing or with whom so long as he could be counted upon to do what they required. From what I have read this affair has not been a 'secret' to the administration. And most likely Petraeus would have testified as if nothing was amiss until the whistle-blower let the Republicans in on the investigation.

Once the Republicans were told, there is no way Petraeus could go and testify at a hearing with the possibility that one of those Republicans might ask him about his affair. Petraeus had to go. Can you imagine what kind of tv it would make for a Republican to ask Petraeus, when did President Obama know about your affair?

40 posted on 11/10/2012 11:22:45 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts

Gowdy says “ Petraeus will testify voluntarily over Benghazi or we will subpoena him “

So can’t they still ask him when President Obama knew about his affair?

This is all so twisted!


50 posted on 11/10/2012 11:36:19 PM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson