” The fact she says the CIA had three militia prisoners at the annex means Petraeus was feeding her info, probably classified info.”
Surely the fact that CIA had 3 militia prisoners must have been Secret or Top Secret information, as this, to my knowledge, is the first time it has come to light. What’s interesting/odd is that I thought this affair ended many months ago. So why was Petraeus sharing such sensitive info with her in October? And was he doing so via his presumably unencrypted personal Gmail account? And if his Gmail was being monitored, didn’t anyone in the FBI pick up on this fact etc.? This “most transparent administration in history” has some serious ‘splainin’ to do!
You have jumped to all sorts of uncorroborated conclusions. The FBI did nothing because they discovered nothing suggesting Petraeus was passing on classified info.
And, folks, get a clue. People in DC have private lives and private email accounts. Everyone.