[OneWingedShark]

>>completely minimizing/discounting the judges he appointed to the State’s Supreme Court?
>
>You really don't comprehend the difference between the state and federal courts, do you?

That's not the point: the point is that Romney has appointed judges who are terrible: just as liberal and activist as any Obama's appointed.
It is therefore most reasonable to assume he would appoint similar to federal positions. IOW, A Romney win would have resulted in exactly the same sort of people being nominated as Obama has nominated.

And the difference [betwixt State & Federal], is merely one of jurisdiction.

[Alaska Wolf]

A Romney win would have resulted in exactly the same sort of people being nominated as Obama has nominated.

Conjecture and speculation. Reagan was a democrat. Goode was a democrat. Both facts.

And the difference [betwixt State & Federal], is merely one of jurisdiction.

There's a huge difference between state and federal jurisdiction. There is a reason for the USSC!

It's over. Romney lost and we now get to suffer 4 more years of Obama, his USSC nominees, attack on the 2nd Amendment, Holder, Biden, Clinton and Janet Napolitano. Hope you're happy.