Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: olcurmudgeon
As I understand it, the General received treatment for prostate cancer. Was he capable of having an affair other than platonic? I raise this question since I am a prostate cancer survivor.
7 posted on 11/12/2012 2:18:43 AM PST by cannonball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cannonball
Relationships can be romantic without being sexual, and that may have been the case with Petraeus and this woman. However, I doubt either party is going to raise the “we-made-out-but-didn't-go-all-the-way” defense!
23 posted on 11/12/2012 4:08:33 AM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cannonball
You bring up an excellent point. Most men the General’s age who have prostrate cancer surgery find their ability to perform sexually gone or diminished.

Interestingly enough we can throw flames at the General for having a relationship with a woman when he is thousands of miles from home for extended periods of time yet we give a pass to some of Republican, Conservative Leaders who have had affairs while married and living the good life in DC.

I'm not condoning, I just sayin.

31 posted on 11/12/2012 6:31:01 AM PST by not2worry ( NO MORE YEARS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cannonball

You should know far better than I that there are prostate cancer treatments that do not result in impotence.

Too many types and variations of prostate cancer.

But then I am not a physician and do not play one on TV.

Seems clear at this point that the relationship was sexual...


32 posted on 11/12/2012 7:42:11 AM PST by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson