Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At the Fiscal Cliff I Cry "Jump, Jump, Jump!"
Townhall.com ^ | November 13, 2012 | John Ransom

Posted on 11/13/2012 5:14:33 AM PST by Kaslin

The most expensive tax in the history of the world has been proposed by the Obama administration and to hear them tell the story, you’d think the rest of us should be grateful.

“We want to create a global minimum tax,” said vice president Joe Biden, “because American taxpayers shouldn’t be providing a larger subsidy for investing abroad than investing at home.”

A global minimum tax is a tax on all profits made by nominally US companies that operate overseas. They operate overseas for various reasons, but one big reason is because corporate taxes are higher in the US than overseas. And to fix high corporate taxes in the US, the Obama administration proposes even HIGHER TAXES on corporations.     

Yes: Obama thinks American taxpayers should be forced to pay higher taxes for everything they buy inexpensively from overseas so Obama can subsidize only government approved activities. 

Our vice president now posits that normal corporate and individual profits in the course of business outside of the US are “subsidies” given out by a benign government.

Oh, where have you gone Harry Truman?  In terms of real subsidies, though, how come Biden doesn’t know that the government should be providing no subsidies at home or abroad?

That’s because, just like any other addict, Biden, Obama and their progressive friends on both the right and the left refuse to understand that they have a problem when it comes to spending money.   

Not content to try to tax the rich here in the United States, Democrats are so hungry for welfare revenues that they now want to tax all revenue, everywhere, ignoring international borders, international waters and universal common sense.

And guess who is gonna pay the tax? When they tolled the bell “rich” during this campaign, understand that that bell tolled for thee.

Because, while the “rich” may be someone across town in the US, the “rich” in Obama’s global sense, is you. This is a tax that will fall most heavily on the poor and middle income earners.   

Liberals can’t understand that the country is losing jobs because the governments in the US- federal and municipal- aren’t competitive anymore. Instead of doing something about the fundamental problem we face, they find it more convenient to rearrange the game pieces to suit their desired outcome.

That’s because they suck at the game of government and public service, liberals do. If Obama was a first round NFL draft choice he’d be Ryan Leaf, a different type of talent bust who, not coincidentally also happens to be an addict.    

I’d love to be a GOP challenger in 2016 asking a Democrats to explain to constituents why raising taxes on everyone and shipping even administrative jobs overseas mades sense.  

Because you, the ordinary reader, will pay for the liberal addiction to spending not just through higher taxes on everything via  Obama’s Global Tax, but through the loss of jobs too. Corporations will stop shipping jobs overseas and just ship the entire company rather than pay another onerous tax.

When you add in the fact that the wall separating Washington and Wall Street has been destroyed over the last decade- but never worse than under Obama- you can see why moving to the Philippines might make sense for say, Caterpillar.   

So now, we can confidently look into an Obama-inspired future when baseball, hot dogs and apple pie are only imports. Forget Chevrolet. They already killed that bit of Americana.

You want to see what America used to look like? Shortly you’ll have to travel overseas to catch a glimpse.     

That’s because this administration has serious issues when it comes to boundaries. I don’t know if Obama was held too much as a child or not held enough, but when it comes to taxes, healthcare, regulatory orders, race issues, food choices,  Obama’s got a Super-Freudian case of separation anxiety.

In everything that he does, he clumsily overreaches, asserting authority that not only he doesn’t have, but probably can‘t enforce without coersion.

Energy? Immigration? Cap and Trade? Gun-Walking? Healthcare? Jobs? Stimulus? Anyone? Bueller?

It would be hard for me to name any success Obama has had on any policy front, even if I qualified and tempered those successes on a Jimmy Carter curve. But anyone can rattle off the unqualified disasters of the administration.

And no disaster would hit the US harder than Obama’s Global Tax.   

Still, you know how bad ideas circulate amongst progressives.

It was only ten years ago we went to sleep confidently thinking we won the Cold War and consigned Communism to the trash bin of history.

Or did we?  

Now we face a fiscal cliff of worldwide proportions, because we've been enjoying the so-called "peace dividend" raising taxes and spending on healthcare, regulatory orders, race issues and food choices

If our ruling elite won't respond to our chants of "jump, jump, jump," I say we push them.


 


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: fiscalcliff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Kaslin
Right now I have no idea why any multi-national company (other than a few who have to deal with the US government like Boeing, General Dynamics, etc.) would keep its corporate headquarters in the US. Why is (for a local example) Procter & Gamble still a US company? They earn a significant portion of their profits outside the US and it seems like they would make a lot more being HQed in another country with a US subsidiary. I think a lot of companies will be asking that same question in the next couple of years.
21 posted on 11/13/2012 9:50:10 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Big Bird is a brood parasite: laid in our nest 43 years ago and we are still feeding him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Certainly the MSM will blame the Republicans, and they have to be ready to take two or three months of abuse head on.

But at the same time, there is going to be increasing to huge pressure put on the Democrats to do something, anything, that they are unable to do on their own. Unions, corporations, and all the people getting largess are going to go nuts as the money supply is cut off.

The markets will go south in a long overdue correction, and the Republicans will then make some very public offers to the Democrats to end it. And when the Democrats refuse to compromise in any way, the Republicans can just shrug.

Eventually the Democrats will break like a dam.


22 posted on 11/13/2012 11:29:30 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: Gil4
Paying less tax is not the same as receiving a subsidy.

The important thing to understand about Democrats is that in their minds, paying less tax is EXACTLY the same as receiving a subsidy. They stare blankly if you try to explain the difference, as I did with our new Congresswoman Annie Kuster a few weeks ago.

24 posted on 11/13/2012 1:28:45 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Incompetentocracy...
KeystoneKopocracy...
Newkidnationocracy...
25 posted on 11/14/2012 8:41:49 AM PST by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson