What a crock of BS. He knew what covert programs were being run out of there, and i bet it’s 99% he watched it on a live predator video feed, complete with audio of his former SEAL CIA agents yelling for support.
He probably knows exactly what was said when support was denied. Don’t forget his Afghanistan order on supporting arms. He’s no stranger to denying grunts in a firefight fire support, so this was nothing new to him.
SO what did he need to go “investigate”?
He went to find out if anything would come out to conflict with the official coverup. POS.
“Petraeus intended the review as a way to prepare for his upcoming testimony before Congress on Benghazi.”
Also known as collusion and “getting the story straight”. He doesn’t need that trip to be able to testify about EXACTLY what he knew and SAW on Sept 11th. More of his treachery.
But now Petraeus is telling friends he does not think he should testify.
What threats have been made? Does he feel "honor bound" to protect his mistress? Is that the leverage being used? or was she one of many?
So he questioned guys in Tripoli, 500 miles from Benghazi, that should really provide perfect information.
You know, this all could be Petraeus’ fault and he is using the adultery excuse to try to hide the blame.
He did not need to fly to Libya to question the (reported) 24 or so—out of 30—CIA personnel who were rescued from the Mission in Bengazi as they would know what transpired both there as well as the CIA safe house.
He didn't go there to investigate anything....COVER UP!!!!!