[onyx]

Hi ya Dog!

The Marxist can’t control his temper.
Now, he’s on record lying.
Notice he couldn’t answer the direct question about their pleas for help?
THAT means he didn’t give the order! He left them to die!

[Golfinsocal]

He thinks he is untouchable; said he reported it was a terror attack, has tried to muddle the time line, but then takes credit for sending a spokesperson to address the issue without briefing him/her? Can the White House request someone to speak on the Presidents behalf, knowing a situations color, but allowing this spokesperson to offer up known lies? How can the content in verbiage be more lawful than the act, I thought law came second, something tangible warrants concern, so law steps in to protect. Seems to me law has become a corporation IE a tangible person. At the very least, the time-line seems to show a willingness to deceive, that is if the time-line has the same corporate structure as legal verbiage. The proverbial single bite at the apple is now given 2?