Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/16/2012 6:47:26 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Kaslin

One sentence synopsis: In order to win elections, conservatives must become liberals.


2 posted on 11/16/2012 6:55:35 AM PST by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I think you can be a compassionate conservative without the hokum of calling yourself one, and without massive deficit spending and more entitlement giveaways. A true compassionate conservative would have reined in the housing bubble and cheap money. Reagan was the compassionate conservative. Just like being a parent, punishing your kid because they’re doing something that will cause them harm is compassion.


3 posted on 11/16/2012 6:58:18 AM PST by throwback (The object of opening the mind, is as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
...if someone said, "I'm a different kind of Catholic (or Jew, or American, etc.): I'm a compassionate Catholic." The insinuation was -- by my lights, at least -- that conservatives who disagreed with him and his "strong-government conservatism" were somehow lacking in compassion.

Zackly.

What was so damned "compassionate" about turning over the education of our children to Ted Kennedy?

Those chickens will be coming home to roost (and thereby answering Jeremiah Wright's prayer for America) for years, decades, to come.

Thanks, George.

Of course he was a better President than Obama.

My toilet bowl would make a better President than Obama. At least it does the job it was created to do.

8 posted on 11/16/2012 7:01:30 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Te?xas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Here’s a thought: how about leading with one’s ideas, and attempt to win over hearts & minds (or just minds), rather than following?


12 posted on 11/16/2012 7:12:18 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Rush said it best. Conservative-ism is already compassionate.


15 posted on 11/16/2012 7:16:12 AM PST by bmwcyle (Women reelected Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I disagree.. G.W. Bush owes conservatives an apology for paving the way to totalitarianism...


18 posted on 11/16/2012 7:18:45 AM PST by Breto (The Establishment party is killing our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I agree we owe Bush credit for winning two terms and creating a message that got the votes needed.

We also need to recognize that true Reaganesque ideas can be successful electorally and can be inclusive so moderates and independents can feel like they will benefit from the policies...and the same with Hispanic voters, women, etc. Bush had a populist tone and understanding language that did win Hispanic support. I saw it in a big way here in Florida in 2004. There some of the strongest support in the days ahead of that campaign came from Latinos. We don’t need to change policies but we have to battle the left’s constant focus on driving a wedge between Republicans and different groups. Bush did a great job of that. Although I didn’t see it during the campaign, Romney and the RNC did not.


19 posted on 11/16/2012 7:18:54 AM PST by ilgipper (Obama supporters are comprised of the uninformed & the ill-informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It’s save-yourself time.


20 posted on 11/16/2012 7:19:12 AM PST by Flightdeck (My four children have been robbed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What is “compassionate” about holding a gun to my head to extract tax dollars, to be given to others unwilling to earn their own way, to support behavior of which I disapprove?

What is “compassionate” about forcibly supporting immorality, destroying the family, undermining the work ethic, and denying the fundamental right of private property?

What is “compassionate” about the willful destruction of any semblance of education, to replace it with indoctrination into the preferred belief system of a self-appointed elite class?

What is “compassionate” about believing that much of the population is incapable of existing without coddling worthy of infants?

Sorry, not buying it.


23 posted on 11/16/2012 7:24:07 AM PST by motor_racer (Pete, do you ever get tired, of the driving?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Truth will eventually win, it will just take the right person to point out the lie that is liberalism.

Liberalism has always failed and will always fail. That’s just a fact.

This FACT needs to be shouted from the rooftops.

We need to start with FDR and rewrite the history books to show what an utter failure liberalism has ALWAYS been.


25 posted on 11/16/2012 7:25:02 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“compassionate conservatism”

Yeah, like conservatism is evil and cruel.

Reminds me of how the word gay was stolen and now means homosexual trumps happy.

If Bush represents conservatism and he is what they should aspire to be like—count me out. I’ll find a new word.


27 posted on 11/16/2012 7:27:56 AM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Ya know....screw this! There isn’t a republican party. The republicans are democrats and the democrats are progressive communists.

The Democrat Party and the Progressive party. That is what we have now.


29 posted on 11/16/2012 7:31:37 AM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
One of the biggest problems with Bush was that he let the Demonrats define him & attack him daily without standing up for himself. This allowed the media to define the whole party the same way.

The notion that he was above "all that" is bunk, our system of election is an adversarial one where you fight with words & ideas. He never stood up & defended conservatism and explained the evils of liberalism.

The only thing he did that a Demonrat wouldn't have done is cut taxes and even then he didn't make them permanent even when Republicans controlled all 3 branches.

30 posted on 11/16/2012 7:32:56 AM PST by Smittie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

compassionate conservatism - Someone who believes in charity, but chooses to whom and how much of their own personal wealth they choose to give and is content without talking about it and telling everyone how much they give to charity.

Someone who believes in God, traditional American family, family values, strong military, stronger foreign policy, and robust economy.


31 posted on 11/16/2012 7:34:57 AM PST by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"As president, he said that "when somebody hurts, government has got to move."

Ignoring the fact that a lot of misery is the direct result of government *taking action*.

55 posted on 11/16/2012 8:26:00 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Some sophisticated analysts, such as my National Review colleague Ramesh Ponnuru, always acknowledged the philosophical shortcomings and inconsistencies of compassionate conservatism, but argued that something like it was necessary nonetheless.

Compassionate conservatism is just another name for mixed economy, political eclecticism, and pragmatism. It has no ideology, is pluralistic, and it has philosophical shortcomings and inconsistencies because it is a mixture of conservatism and statism.

60 posted on 11/16/2012 9:00:38 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bull poop.

All the reasons he hated bush’s estrogenic “compassionate conservatism” were correct. The fact that idiots answering a forced poll question about who cares about “little people like me” chose Obama over Romney, whom they were told is rich and indifferent, has nothing to bear on George Bush’s liberal mush.


67 posted on 11/16/2012 10:11:12 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” cost us dearly, fiscally and politically.


71 posted on 11/16/2012 10:16:12 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

GWB Rove and Co. are the reason we are in the mess we are now electorally.


80 posted on 11/16/2012 10:51:54 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

82 posted on 11/16/2012 11:06:30 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson