Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xrmusn

After a career in HR, I will say that two part-timers instead of one full-timer is less efficient, and adds expenses for the company in many ways. It’s not just an equal replacement. For example, now there are twice as many employees, so there are space problems, logistics problems, like parking, all processing (like payroll) takes longer because there are twice a many to handle, and all the little issues related to employees are doubled. More hiring time. More turnover. Many other things like that. So being forced to run a company with more lower-hours employees has a negative impact on the productivity of the company. If the company is on the edge financially anyway, it might not survive such a change.


18 posted on 11/18/2012 5:07:30 AM PST by Old_Grouch (65 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Old_Grouch

All true, but in certain industries - like the restaurant business - those factors have far less impact and you’ll certainly see a much greater proportion of part-time workers.


19 posted on 11/18/2012 5:15:23 AM PST by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson