Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LucianOfSamasota

"Yet in the 1950s incomes in the top bracket faced a marginal tax rate of 91, that’s right, 91 percent, while taxes on corporate profits were twice as large, relative to national income, as in recent years. The best estimates suggest that circa 1960 the top 0.01 percent of Americans paid an effective federal tax rate of more than 70 percent, twice what they pay today."

Psst... somebody should tell the economic reactionary, Mr. Krugman, that it's not 1950 anymore, and we kinda, sorta have immense competition from countries like China and India that we didn't have before...

9 posted on 11/19/2012 8:37:26 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Qbert

dont forget western europe and Japan were still devastated by war


22 posted on 11/19/2012 9:27:32 AM PST by hecht (restore Hetch-Hetchy, and screw San Francisco and Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Krugman is a GENIUS!

If Obama had doubled the U.S. corporate tax rate, then Hostess would never have had to go bankrupt!

And tripling the corporate taxes on Hostess, etc would have increased Hostess profits tremendously!

Genius, sheer genius!

And in the same logic, raise income taxes on the poor from the current nothing to 90 percent and they will all be rich!

Wow! Brilliant thinking (for the incurably insane).


28 posted on 11/19/2012 10:17:38 AM PST by OldArmy52 (The question is not whether Obama ever lies, but whether he ever tells the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson