Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
You can do a simple analysis as follows:

State winners:
RATS 26 states x 2 =52 + 3 from DC = 55
GOP: 24 states x 2 = 48

Add in the congressional districts won or leading:
RATS 201 districts + 52 from the state wins + DC = 256 electoral votes
GOP 233 districts + 48 from the state wins = 281 electoral votes.

Of course, the above does not take into account congressional districts which vote for congressmen and presidents of opposite parties. But it does serve as a reasonable guideline of what would happen on the national level if every state adopted the district system.

40 posted on 11/20/2012 7:49:40 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
Of course, the above does not take into account congressional districts which vote for congressmen and presidents of opposite parties.

There were a lot of them this election. That is why I asked. If presidential electors were selected in every state the way Maine and Nebraska do now, would it have changed the result this year? I honestly do not know, and your post doesn't answer it.

45 posted on 11/20/2012 8:53:59 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman; Lurking Libertarian; Kolath
Because the Congressional Districts are set by the state legislatures each decade - and because of the requirement, cheerfully followed by Republican state legislators, that blacks be concentrated in CDs which will elect black representatives, the CDs are gerrymandered in favor of the party controlling the legislature of each state.
This has the redeeming characteristic that, although the Senate no longer represents the state governments, the House of Representatives, to some extent, does. In a milieu in which the Republicans have been controlling the state legislatures, that would favor Republican presidential candidates if they enacted the per-CD rule for allocating electoral votes.
I’m sure the Democrats would be delighted to switch from the unit rule to the CD system if it favored them - and equally certain that they would cry “foul!” if they thought it favored the Republicans. They would really cry “Foul!” if the Republican legislatures appointed the Electors directly, or simply ruled the incumbent POTUS off the ballot - as the Constitution
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
certainly would seem to permit.

56 posted on 11/21/2012 8:58:29 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson