Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a pretty classy opus, and another "random act of journalism" in it's own way. As the article explains later:


“It’s a little complicated, but we were expected to do somewhat unbalanced news, politically, in general.”

Neither Michaels nor Consiglio would say what specific political leaning they were expected to adopt.

Consiglio, who also was executive producer, said the balanced journalistic approach they use for all their stories was sometimes frowned upon.


In my opinion, journalists who adhere to the principles of fairness and unbiased reporting deserve respect and support, regardless of whatever their own personal political views might be. Bravo to these two.

1 posted on 11/21/2012 7:46:06 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bigbob
Its pretty obvious what bias they were expected to take.

I'd have an iota of respect for the US news media in general if this were to happen more often.

2 posted on 11/21/2012 7:57:03 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Good for them. I hope they remain honest - although it will be VERY hard to find another journalism job that tolerates integrity.


3 posted on 11/21/2012 7:57:17 AM PST by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Perhaps they were being asked to knock off the left-wing bias? There’s nothing in the article that makes it clear.

These are *journalists* - I’m not going to assume that they have integrity just because they say they do.


4 posted on 11/21/2012 8:05:42 AM PST by agere_contra ("Government creates nothing" - Romney, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
"Neither Michaels nor Consiglio would say what specific political leaning they were expected to adopt. "

Not if they expect to ever get another job.

Then again, they would actually be DOING their job if they reported it- which they should have done ON-AIR as they were leaving

6 posted on 11/21/2012 8:07:42 AM PST by Mr. K (some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

"I'm as mad as Hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

9 posted on 11/21/2012 8:10:55 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Most “journalists” consider the truth to have a conservative bias, so I’ll withold my opinion on these two.


10 posted on 11/21/2012 8:13:01 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Oh, if they did anything before, it should be easy enough to figure out.


12 posted on 11/21/2012 8:13:47 AM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (I will fear no muslim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

The last thng a news agency wants is an honest Journalist.

They would rather have the Chris Mathews, Rachel Maddow type.

You know freaks who get a tingle when they speak of the Muslim in the WH.


13 posted on 11/21/2012 8:16:24 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

The news media is not news, it is Communist propaganda.


15 posted on 11/21/2012 8:17:51 AM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
we were expected to do somewhat unbalanced news, politically, in general.

Quit beating around the bush and lay it all on the table. Now is their chance. Strike while the iron is hot.

20 posted on 11/21/2012 8:31:25 AM PST by bgill (We've passed the point of no return. Welcome to Al Amerika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

If they resigned as a matter of principle, then they could not have been liberals.


22 posted on 11/21/2012 8:41:40 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

TV News outlets are structured and have a bureaucracy behind them . The person who slants the news is your news director who directs the readers (anchors= actors really)or even may write the news or review their article and suggest a slant to it, as they’re presenting a story, for them to deliver. Now a reporter has a more independent role but is still not as independent as a commentator

Without knowing who the power behind the thrown is. It’s hard to tell sometimes where they’re (the reader) is comming from. You have to pay attention to the credits as they scroll past quickly on the screen.


23 posted on 11/21/2012 8:41:53 AM PST by mosesdapoet ("A voice crying in the wilderness make streight for the way of the Lord")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
In my opinion, journalists who adhere to the principles of fairness and unbiased reporting deserve respect and support, regardless of whatever their own personal political views might be. Bravo to these two.

Just to be clear, almost *all* the newsreaders clame to be "unbiased." Dan Rather, for example, always claimed he was.

25 posted on 11/21/2012 8:43:45 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stylecouncilor

ping


28 posted on 11/21/2012 9:02:46 AM PST by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson