[TurboZamboni]

"Labeling a dispute 'political' is not a legal argument; it is a talking point masquerading—poorly—as an argument," said the filing for the committee chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif. "Federal courts have been deciding cases regarding the executive's compliance with subpoenas since the earliest days of the Republic."

[SierraWasp]

Push ‘em back, push ‘em back, harder, harder... push ‘em back, farther, farther!!!

[NonValueAdded]

Zero Holder’s budget, what is so difficult to understand about the power of the purse?

[Trteamer]

Government lawyer in court against government lawyers. let the gravy train roll! I expect nothing to come of it....

[Tupelo]

As I said earlier; Down the rabbit hole, never to be heard of again. Benghazi is next. Then they can all sit around and sing Kumbya.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

I haven’t seen or heard much from Issa lately. Is he still around?

[A'elian' nation]

Calling Judge Sirica.

Sirica did more to expose Watergate than Woodward and Bernstein. He made them talk except for Gordon Liddy.

[The Free Engineer]

Is the Justice Department/White House still holding out on a privilege log?

They should be shredded in court without one.

Of course they can't submit a list of documents and reasons for privilege because then they will expose their hands.

Either they will clue the committee into new documents they don't have or if they don't list a document which the committee knows of but doesn't "officially" have it could be bad.

[little jeremiah]

*