![](http://i52.tinypic.com/dwwdmv.jpg")
Maybe it's slightly off topic, maybe not...
Posted on 11/21/2012 9:48:58 PM PST by robowombat
.
Obama to Hold ‘Private’ Swear-in Ceremony for Second Presidential Term
(John Roberts redux? ... and the beat goes on, ♪La♫de♪La♫de♪deee♫ - ♪La♫de♪La♫de♪daaaa♫)
Check out article, then see # 22 showing how the Selective Service Card was altered.
.
Maybe it's slightly off topic, maybe not...
I've never seen a 9 digit SSN.
Please clarify.
If it did turn out (and the evidence is in) that Obama is not a naturalized citizen and is responsible for criminal actions while in office colluding with a global crime syndicate what would be the repercussions?
If a tree falls in the forest...
What I would like to see is someone in the mainstream media play a little game. On a slow news day, they should “uncover” evidence that George w bush was using a few social security numbers and spent a year, the year he “may have been missing” from the Guard, in soviet Russia. Or some other enemy country. Just a few suspicious things, and declare that they think at least that these questions should be investigated. Especially since his father was the head of the CIA. Hmmm.
Well the good news about it being private is that it will spare us from having to watch Justice Roberts and Obama tongue each other.
Near the end of the article it reads “...responsible for criminal actions while in office...”. I am sure we all know that Barky just being in office is criminal and taking the presidency by fraud is probably the biggest criminal offense in US history.
Why does the little that is out there in “the news” focus on where he was born?
He uses his own voice in his audio book to proclaim his foreign father. There you have smoking gun #1. It’s right there. So simple. He has the old RINO establishment so afraid of being called racist, they’ll let a usurper dictate and ruin our country for 8 years, the second term to be the most damaging and irreversable.
The original scheme implemented in 1936 by the Social Security Administration to assign an individual unique identification number was based on nine numerals divided into three segments:
o An "Area Number" assigned to a geographical area consisting of three numerals
o A "Group Number" consisting of two numerals issuable in an assigned Area o A "Serial Number consisting of four numerals and issued to one individual only.
The grouping appeared on the Social Security Identification Card in three blocks separated by hyphens, of the form AAA-GG-SSSS This system was in effect at least until 1972. I suppose there will come a time when all possible unique nine-digit unique numbers are in current use, so the fields will have to be expanded to provide more numbers. But right now I think the 9-digit system is sufficient.
There has never been an eight-numeral SSN, AFIK.
You have never seen an SSN that was either more or less than nine numerals, eh?
Yes. I had a brain fart.
“The file also allegedly showed trusts and a $1.2 million loan taken out from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.” That would be truly stunning, given that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do not make direct loans to consumers. Definitely strong element of foil hat, with sprinkles.
Maybe this fraud was done in 2008?
As you can see, all the other examples of 1980 have 19 in front of the 80.
That’s the belief. That he (or Bill Ayers, George Soros, etc) realized he needed a valid SSC a bit late in the campaign.
An afterthought on the shopping list? "Ooops, we need eggs. Don't forget to buy eggs." What else did they forget, or what else did they remember to put in when it was almost too late?
He presented his birth certificate to America 2 years late.. His certification of eligibility presented to and signed off by the Speaker Pelosi is a story unto itself.. Hawaii got a different version than the other 49 States.
So why didn’t they cook all of this up in 1995 when they were busy getting BO’s political career launched?
Obama will use a Koran to be sworn in instead of a Holy Bible? Therefore its a priovate ceremony?
Buahahahahaha! Its amazing.
Obama may as well swear in his dog in his place.
His presidency is over. He will not cow a free people with his antics. Bring it on a$$hole. You effing Muslim fascist a$$hat!
I skimmed through Ayers’ Fugitive Days and seem to recall he was quite the forger, as needed...not an expert, but willing and ready to do what needed to be done.
And as long as I’ve got my foil hat firmly in place...I find it quite interesting that old Billy and his hag wife were hanging out in Egypt for a months, early in 2012. Gee....the place “the video” started a fuss. Surely, he was “just a guy in THAT neighborhood”....
That said, the Presidential oath is required before entering into the office. Taking it is necessary but not sufficient to make one President. One must also meet the Constitutional requirements, and get a majority of the electoral votes. All three are required. Just two doesn't cut it.
But when you get down to it. It doesn't matter, if the oath taker doesn't believe in the Constitution and is just mouthing the words, they won't uphold the oath anyway. There is no legal penalty for violation AFAIK, you can't even impeach them for violating their oath.. what you can impeach them for is in the Constitution. It's left an exercise for the reader to go look it up. :)
I don’t think it’s foil hat at all. I think alot of people in DC KNOW he’s not eligible, and knowing that, the only way they can protect themselves against a treason charge is to do all this in private.
That was the very first thing that crossed my mind when he conveniently “flubbed” the oath the first time around.
“Otherwise, the Speaker of the House [Boehner] who will be sworn in on 3 January 2012 will be the President for [at least] 24 hours.”
If this happens, Mr. Boehner should take the opportunity to sign an executive order that instructs all federal agencies to desist in the execution and enforcement of any component of the Affordable Care Act. This would be predictably greeted in the press with howls of “constitutional overreach.” Yet such an order would be as legitimate as Obama’s various orders to see that selected laws such as DOMA and immigration laws are not enforced properly, despite the president’s clear constitutional duty to do so.
Even though the order would be quickly reversed by Obama, it would offer a useful opportunity to remind the nation of this president’s lawless rule.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.