Replies

I can’t read that without paragraphs.

I can’t read pabulum that refutes nothing. There have been countless articles documenting voter fraud. You have proved nothing at all, and I gleaned that after reading a few sentences, before my eyes refused to read the wall of text.

Sorry, it had paragraphs when it started.

There is little to refute in anything you said. It contains two specific examples given of "fraud", showing that there was no fraud, and it also deals with some generalities of fraud providing information that refutes those claims.

I offer you the same deal I offer all the other conspiracists. Find your best example of "massive fraud", provide the specific evidence, and I'll research it and explain it to you. Maybe there will be real fraud there. Probably not.

To give you an example -- in one case of the "look at all the precincts that voted almost exclusively for Obama", they actually provided a precinct in Virginia. That was useful, because Virginia has a great online database spanning the last 12 years.

So, I compared Romney/Obama numbers from 2012 with the last 5 elections, and not surprisingly, found that McCain did no better in 2008, and even McDonnell who won big in 2010 only did slightly better in that precinct. The precinct simply is a near-100% democrat precinct.

I imagine that if you did the research on all the Philidelphia precincts, you'd find the same thing. Meanwhile, nobody has ever come to a conclusion about the reports about poll watchers being kicked out. We got "reports" about it, but how do we know what reports were true, and which were just someone misunderstanding something they read?

The 108% Ohio number has been thoroughly debunked, as has the 141% ballots claim. The "Romney leading in all the swing states" has been debunked, as has the "all the polls showed Romney would Win" claim.

BTW, I fixed the paragraphs, but it is sad that you are incapable of reading things if they aren't provided to you in small, digestible pieces. And while I now have paragraphs, I still have big words, so maybe you'll still have trouble reading it.

And I don't care -- this is a serious intellectual discussion, and if you can't be bothered to read stuff (you said earlier you don't have time), then you probably won't be able to add much to the conversation.