But wouldn't black males be angry about that? And Hispanic males? And gay males?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: chessplayer
Ruth and I don’t see eye to eye on much, but I believe her point is that there is no token quota that should determine how many women sit on the bench at one time.
I’d agree with her on that for various demographics.
To: chessplayer
Obama put two so called females(LOL) on the court
3 posted on
11/26/2012 8:33:32 AM PST by
molson209
To: chessplayer
This jerk Ginsberg has wasted enough time on the Supreme Court - get her out NOW!
4 posted on
11/26/2012 8:33:56 AM PST by
Ken522
To: chessplayer
And that shows the damaged mind and lack of logic of RBG.
When there were 9 men on the SCOTUS, women were explicitly excluded. Is she advocating explicitly excluding men? RBG’s idea of equality is inequality?
5 posted on
11/26/2012 8:34:10 AM PST by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: chessplayer
8 posted on
11/26/2012 8:37:56 AM PST by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
To: chessplayer
Ain’t she cute with her coy remark? Leftists like her are a censorious and have tunnel vision. To her it’s about a POLITICAL agenda. That’s not what the Supreme Court is intended to be. It’s supposed to be a panel of Constitutional experts who don’t bring personal polical agendas to their decisions. Kagan and Sotomayer are political agenda hacks through and through and are not at all qualified to be sitting on that once prestigious panel. I’m sure there are qualified women for the Supreme Court, but the last two picks, Kagan and Sotomayer are not among them.
To: chessplayer
Another leftist who cares nothing about meritocracy. It’s all about “identity”, preferably those who share hers.
12 posted on
11/26/2012 8:38:58 AM PST by
BlueStateRightist
(Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.)
To: chessplayer
This is more babble from a second rate ideologically driven mind. She is a spokescreature for sexism, racism and the politics of hate filled rhetoric and partisan divisiveness.
Ms Ginsburg should go back on her meds or be impeached for being incompetent.
TWB
13 posted on
11/26/2012 8:42:21 AM PST by
TWhiteBear
(Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
To: chessplayer
“... But thered been nine men, and nobodys ever raised a question about that,
Lots of people DID raise questions about an all male supreme court... and that’s the only reason why IDIOTS LIKE GINSBURG stood a chance to be included in the first place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
14 posted on
11/26/2012 8:44:29 AM PST by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
To: chessplayer
I’m all for equal opportunity, but I’m more for the best qualified people for the job (woman or man). Ever have to deal with a government agency? Where do they get some of these people???
Right before WWII, the US needed a major leap forward in cryptography (code breakers for people in Rio Lindo, ala Rush). The Government agencies and military couldn’t go to the American Cryptography Society, or the universities - they had to pick from the pool of people who had passed the civil service exam first. We were waaaay behind every other nation in code breaking in 1940.
17 posted on
11/26/2012 8:48:08 AM PST by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
To: chessplayer
In person, one night only, the incomparable Ruth ‘Buzzy’ Ginsburg. Laugh till your sides ache. 8PM showtime. Two drink minimum.
18 posted on
11/26/2012 8:48:16 AM PST by
JPG
(Stay strong.)
To: chessplayer
Let a white male SCOTUS member say that and watch the blow back. But her...............crickets
19 posted on
11/26/2012 8:48:29 AM PST by
V_TWIN
(obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
To: chessplayer
Obama might need an all-gay supereme court.
20 posted on
11/26/2012 8:49:09 AM PST by
granada
To: chessplayer
Or nine idiots, we already have a few.
To: chessplayer
Currently there is only one. Six men. And two other/gender non-specific types.
22 posted on
11/26/2012 8:51:06 AM PST by
riri
(Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
To: chessplayer
Justice Ginsburg needs a padded cell.
23 posted on
11/26/2012 8:52:08 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(Women reelected Obama)
To: chessplayer
Morsi told his buddy Obama to get rid of the Courts and Congress. It’s easy.
25 posted on
11/26/2012 8:53:32 AM PST by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
To: chessplayer
But thered been nine men, and nobodys ever raised a question about that, she said. Actually, at least one person raised a question, that would be Ginsberg herself. She actually contradicts herself in the same sentence but I guess that amazing legal mind thinks it is ok.
In reality, numerous people have questioned having 9 men including most likely Ronald Reagan.
26 posted on
11/26/2012 8:55:33 AM PST by
staytrue
To: chessplayer
Yeah, an all (leftist) female Supreme Court would behave like a Victoria’s Secret sale riot.
27 posted on
11/26/2012 8:56:31 AM PST by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
To: chessplayer
curious what religion she ‘practices’.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson