Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

But wouldn't black males be angry about that? And Hispanic males? And gay males?
1 posted on 11/26/2012 8:30:12 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: chessplayer

Ruth and I don’t see eye to eye on much, but I believe her point is that there is no token quota that should determine how many women sit on the bench at one time.

I’d agree with her on that for various demographics.


2 posted on 11/26/2012 8:33:06 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Obama put two so called females(LOL) on the court


3 posted on 11/26/2012 8:33:32 AM PST by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

This jerk Ginsberg has wasted enough time on the Supreme Court - get her out NOW!


4 posted on 11/26/2012 8:33:56 AM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

And that shows the damaged mind and lack of logic of RBG.

When there were 9 men on the SCOTUS, women were explicitly excluded. Is she advocating explicitly excluding men? RBG’s idea of equality is inequality?


5 posted on 11/26/2012 8:34:10 AM PST by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Ruth Bader Meinhof


8 posted on 11/26/2012 8:37:56 AM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Ain’t she cute with her coy remark? Leftists like her are a censorious and have tunnel vision. To her it’s about a POLITICAL agenda. That’s not what the Supreme Court is intended to be. It’s supposed to be a panel of Constitutional experts who don’t bring personal polical agendas to their decisions. Kagan and Sotomayer are political agenda hacks through and through and are not at all qualified to be sitting on that once prestigious panel. I’m sure there are qualified women for the Supreme Court, but the last two picks, Kagan and Sotomayer are not among them.


10 posted on 11/26/2012 8:38:21 AM PST by Best and Brightest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Another leftist who cares nothing about meritocracy. It’s all about “identity”, preferably those who share hers.


12 posted on 11/26/2012 8:38:58 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
This is more babble from a second rate ideologically driven mind. She is a spokescreature for sexism, racism and the politics of hate filled rhetoric and partisan divisiveness.
Ms Ginsburg should go back on her meds or be impeached for being incompetent.
TWB
13 posted on 11/26/2012 8:42:21 AM PST by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

“... But there’d been nine men, and nobody’s ever raised a question about that,”

Lots of people DID raise questions about an all male supreme court... and that’s the only reason why IDIOTS LIKE GINSBURG stood a chance to be included in the first place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


14 posted on 11/26/2012 8:44:29 AM PST by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

I’m all for equal opportunity, but I’m more for the best qualified people for the job (woman or man). Ever have to deal with a government agency? Where do they get some of these people???

Right before WWII, the US needed a major leap forward in cryptography (code breakers for people in Rio Lindo, ala Rush). The Government agencies and military couldn’t go to the American Cryptography Society, or the universities - they had to pick from the pool of people who had passed the civil service exam first. We were waaaay behind every other nation in code breaking in 1940.


17 posted on 11/26/2012 8:48:08 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
In person, one night only, the incomparable Ruth ‘Buzzy’ Ginsburg. Laugh till your sides ache. 8PM showtime. Two drink minimum.
18 posted on 11/26/2012 8:48:16 AM PST by JPG (Stay strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
Let a white male SCOTUS member say that and watch the blow back. But her...............crickets
19 posted on 11/26/2012 8:48:29 AM PST by V_TWIN (obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Obama might need an all-gay supereme court.


20 posted on 11/26/2012 8:49:09 AM PST by granada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Or nine idiots, we already have a few.


21 posted on 11/26/2012 8:50:45 AM PST by polkajello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Currently there is only one. Six men. And two other/gender non-specific types.


22 posted on 11/26/2012 8:51:06 AM PST by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Justice Ginsburg needs a padded cell.


23 posted on 11/26/2012 8:52:08 AM PST by bmwcyle (Women reelected Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Morsi told his buddy Obama to get rid of the Courts and Congress. It’s easy.


25 posted on 11/26/2012 8:53:32 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
But there’d been nine men, and nobody’s ever raised a question about that,” she said.

Actually, at least one person raised a question, that would be Ginsberg herself. She actually contradicts herself in the same sentence but I guess that amazing legal mind thinks it is ok.

In reality, numerous people have questioned having 9 men including most likely Ronald Reagan.

26 posted on 11/26/2012 8:55:33 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
Yeah, an all (leftist) female Supreme Court would behave like a Victoria’s Secret sale riot.
27 posted on 11/26/2012 8:56:31 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

curious what religion she ‘practices’.


28 posted on 11/26/2012 8:56:48 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson