[Hemingway's Ghost]

The specific issue is pot usage not your abstract.

Yes, but the logic you used to arrive at your conclusion should hold firm, whether you apply it to pot, Dunkin' Donuts coffee, asparagus, running shoes, or toothpaste.

You determined X should be illegal because of Y, and made a definitive statement to that affect, did you not?

[pfflier]

Let me restate it again, The specific issue is pot usage.

The logic I used was specifically and exclusively with respect to that, nothing else.