Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

No, each state did not hold a secession convention, though some did. Each state that pretended to secession had its own notion as to what process would be most convincing. None of them submitted a federal suit to the supreme court, which is the constitutional means to resolve controversies between the states and the federal government.

They all missed the one way that would have been legal. That was because they all recognized that they had no legal case. Rather, they planned to use force to support their insurrection. They lost.

The war saved lives. If the rebels had won, WWI would have had its branch in North America, and millions of US and pretended confederate soldiers would have fought and died then too. By contrast the 11 million killed in WWII had only about 100,000 US soldiers.


158 posted on 11/28/2012 4:12:09 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: donmeaker
They all missed the one way that would have been legal.

A legal way would be to amend the Constitution to provide for secession procedures.

The most fundamental problem for secessionists right now is that there are very few secessionists. Too many people are too patriotic. The most immediate danger for secessionists would involve the risk that their own neighbors might do them harm, particularly in a place like Texas.

161 posted on 11/28/2012 4:18:17 PM PST by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: donmeaker
The war saved lives. If the rebels had won, WWI would have had its branch in North America, and millions of US and pretended confederate soldiers would have fought and died then too. By contrast the 11 million killed in WWII had only about 100,000 US soldiers.

You've been reading Harry Turtledove's "Southern Victory" series, haven't you? Good series. It's tough to say about WWI and so on. There was one alternate scenario written in 1960 where both the South and North were on the same side in WWI, so who knows?
175 posted on 11/28/2012 7:05:51 PM PST by Nowhere Man (Whitey, I miss you so much. Take care, pretty girl. (4-15-2001 - 10-12-2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson