[Christie at the beach]

Now, we will have contests from the left to see the depth of grossness each side can go. He can do whatever he likes. Like I said earlier, in the week, I don't want to go down the road to the leftists whack jobs; the same ones who smeared Palin’s little boy. This is where we don't need to be to win. We need tough leaders, the 2 ideologies crashing and one winner. The good guys. I understand what he thinks he is doing. It's too odd-I think he put a mini flag in there. Dumb. Whatever..Me, a thumbs down.

[Ouderkirk]

I have often been at a loss to understand this idea where when one is assaulted morally or otherwise that the idea of net engaging the offender gives one the moral high ground.

Having attempted to take the high ground in such circumstances, how is it that while I may have taken the high ground....I lost the debate. There was little satisfaction for myself in having taken the high ground in the face of losing the debate. Whereas I have descended to their level and triumphed in the debate, I lost the high ground and was declared the loser.

The moral of the story is with the circumstance you have outlined....there is no way to win against those who offend. I am just expected to take it and offer no resistance to be thought a better person and yet am still viewed as a loser.

In order to defeat these leftist whackjobs one has to gore their sacred cows, filet them and stuff them down their throats as they have gored my sacred cows and stuffed them down my throat.

Sometimes fighting is the answer and war does solve the problem.