Reynolds v. United States in 1878 already defined marriage as one woman and one man.
Minor v. Happersett (1874) defined natural born Citizen thusly: a class consisting of citizens born in the U.S.A. of citizen parents. If you’ve ever noticed, our President claims to be a native born citizen but NOT a natural born Citizen. He knows the difference.
Thank you for bringing Reynolds v. United States (1878) to my attention. Do you notice how both cases are being ignored?
Neither SCOTUS case seems to be respected or treated with the weight of settled law, wouldn’t you agree?
So, what to do? In my opion get both SCOTUS determinations incorporated into state constitutions. That would be my answer.