I don’t agree, but I suppose it depends on how one defines voter fraud. I do agree that a number of things led to this outcome, and turnout on our side and in the middle needed to be higher. I do think the democrats use the combination of early voting, absentee and loose ID laws to get more votes. I do believe they create registered voters that so not exist and use them to create extra votes. I do believe they provide financial incentives to get people to go to early voting in the big cities. There is plenty of evidence and also lots of anecdotal evidence. Does anyone believe that pockets of Philadelphia, Cleveland, and south Florida have essentially 100% turnouts when the rest of the country does not. Are those area made up of more highly motivated, independent people or are those areas filled with preoe with a lack of motivation and work ethic. Why would people who don’t have work ethic have near unanimous response once every four years. It could be simple get out the vote, but I have a hard time believing after four years of the worst economy of any ones lifetime that they had more motivation to get out to the polls normal. Doesn’t pass the smell test.
I agree. We can’t simply blow off this loss as ‘stolen’ because we have to present a winning platform and candidates to get the votes, and I fully see where Romney was a bad choice and didn’t win the votes he should have. I won’t dismiss the ability for the dems to get their vote out in ways that simply don’t match with their record or campaign message.
I agree this election was marked by massive fraud !! Voter ID is necessary but will never be allowed by the Dem / Lib legislative/judicial system. And quite frankly another factor is that the conservative non-voters were just as stupid as the Obama voters and will will all pay for that for more than the next 4 years !