There is no evidence of vote fraud that would stand up in court, Yash. Therefore, there is no evidence.
And it does relate to the candidate, Romney. If there were demonstrable evidence of vote fraud, the point man for that protest would.....Romney.
Assume you’re right for a moment. Where is the Golden Boy? (Hint: he’s STILL not fighting your cause.)
And just how would you know that? That's just wishcasting on your part.
And it does relate to the candidate, Romney. If there were demonstrable evidence of vote fraud, the point man for that protest would.....Romney.
Assume you’re right for a moment. Where is the Golden Boy? (Hint: he’s STILL not fighting your cause.)
I find it sad that you can't get past the candidate to look at the evidences themselves. The GOP doesn't want it investigated because they don't want to look like "sore losers" or "spoil sports" and have the media bashing them. In other words, they are being the same old spineless GOP that we all know them to be. This shouldn't be surprising to you.
Nevertheless, who the GOP candidate was is ultimately irrelevant at this point - the evidences are all there, just waiting to be investigated...if anyone would have the backbone to actually do it. Shoot, Allen West raised a little cain in his race, and all kinds of evidence for fraud were unearthed. Just think what could happen if somebody actually got busy about investigating the 70,000+ "irregularities" nationwide.
But, since the GOP candidate was the guy you didn't like, we're just supposed to pretend like none of that exists. Of course. It was that sort of questionable approach to honesty that, along with the Benghazi stuff, led me to dump third partyism. What the third partyists kept repeating ad nauseum just didn't line up with what I was actually seeing about Romney. A lot of it was just hype, hokum, and half-truths. Third partyists seem to me to be little different from the Democrats - selectively picking out "truths" that they think work to their favour, while quietly burying those that don't.