Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Rejects Atheist Bid for Right to Perform Marriages
WIBC Indy's News Center ^ | 12/3/2012 | By Eric Berman

Posted on 12/03/2012 7:51:58 PM PST by Bronzy

Judge Sarah Evans Barker says granting clergy the right to perform marriages is the kind of accommodation of religion the First Amendment protects, not a denial of rights to the nonreligious.

(Excerpt) Read more at wibc.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Comments at site interesting.
1 posted on 12/03/2012 7:52:02 PM PST by Bronzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bronzy

I am not getting this.
I many states you don’t have to be anything.
In Colorado anyone can marry anyone as long as they are 18, and abide by a few requirements, like stating why the couple is there, say their name, the couple agrees to what ever they want then you pronounce them married.
The person performing the ceremony, signs the certificate, along with the couple, turns it in and that’s it.


2 posted on 12/03/2012 8:00:44 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
I(n) many states you don’t have to be anything.

Not in Indiana

Under Indiana law, marriages may be solemnized by members of the clergy, judges, mayors, town clerks, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Muslim imams and several other faiths. Center for Inquiry had sued the state with the hope of expanding the law to the nonreligious. - Federal judge rules atheists must become ‘clergy’ to perform marriages
So there the un-religious can only perform marriages by becoming judges, mayors, town clerks.

The CFI wnated a list of 'Secular Celebrants' added, a not unreasonable request.

Dolores's Umbridge solution was that seculars could take advantage of a loophole in the law by spending $5

become a member of the ‘clergy’ by seeking immediate Internet ordination from the Universal Life Church
A farcical ruling that craps on the institutions of marriage, law, and religion.

She should be so overturned on this - First and Fourteemth

3 posted on 12/03/2012 8:42:04 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (By doubting we come to inquiry, and through inquiry we perceive truth. -; Peter Abelard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: svcw
” ... The issue is that a person of faith can have a leader of their world view solemnize that marriage that the nonreligious do not have.”

- Paul Fidalgo, Center for Inquiry

4 posted on 12/03/2012 9:01:55 PM PST by Bronzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bronzy

Atheist clergy..oxymoron


5 posted on 12/04/2012 12:21:55 AM PST by TASMANIANRED (Viva Christo Rey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronzy
So atheists can't marry people because they aren't clergy?

I thought that was the reason we have Unitarians.

6 posted on 12/04/2012 7:07:57 AM PST by rmh47 (Go Kats! - Got eight? [NRA Life Member])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson