Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
There were 40 years between 1775 and 1815. You would have thought they would have learned something about America's homemade rifles during that time.

Funny thing was that most of these rifles were made in small town and rural outbuildings with less sophisticated equipment than today's average garage.

54 posted on 12/04/2012 10:12:18 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

They had their Ferguson rifles they brought in during the Revolutionary War as a counter to the American weapons. They were, in fact, military-grade weapons to the American ‘sporter’ version: they were heavier, threw a heavier round, and far sturdier and easy to repair. All of which was laudable, and they thought that they had the superior rifle.

The problem was that while their rifle didn’t break as much and was more rugged, it required a base of skill they basically didn’t have in England (for a long time after 1815, too) and the more delicate American rifles generally outranged it by quite a large margin. Which some would argue is rather the whole point of rifles... especially ones that were employed in this role.


58 posted on 12/04/2012 2:47:47 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson