Posted on 12/04/2012 8:49:01 AM PST by Sub-Driver
Some won’t let go of their obsession with other people’s personal lives.
Dave can't be held responsible for this comment.While he was making it he was following,out of the corner of his eye,that cute little 22 year old Late Show staffer that was recently hired.
You are wrong. He had no child porn on his computer, never downloaded a single image, and Scotland Yard apologized for the false impression their arrest of him created.
Not mine
Imagine that...a famous celebrity being apologized to by the establishment after being caught red handed.
I bet you think Michael Jackson just liked being around children, right?
“The rock star Pete Townshend was yesterday cautioned by police and placed on the sex offenders register for five years following his admission that he accessed child pornography on the internet.
He was arrested in January as part of Operation Ore, the largest investigation into child pornography in the UK. He admitted using his credit card to access images but claimed they were for “research” for a book.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2003/may/08/arts.ukcrime
Did Scotland Yard apologize for making the celebrity confess to the crime?
It is amazing to me that we’re having this conversation. What hold does pop culture have on your minds?
He was indeed working with an anti child porn group at the time. He was trying to prove that the British Banking Association was willing to process payments to child porn sites. He said in advance that he was going to put his card in the site, to prove it. He did so, but did not access a single picture, nor were any found on his computer. He was expecting to be let off completely, but when the day of the hearing came he was given a choice to either accept the “caution” or go to an open trial. The article you cite is wrong in saying that he accessed images.
I thought he was researching child abuse for his bio. He says he was abused as a kid.
““Radiant, tall, never better looking, strong, well-rested, what you want from a President. ...””
Why in hell would we want a President who looked “well rested”?
“Why in hell would we want a President who looked “well rested”?”
Why in hell would should anyone listen to and/or take seriously the political rantings of a comedian?
Good point. Although calling Letterman a “comedian” is highly charitable. He’s just a sad old un-funny sack of crap these days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.