Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
Sorry didn't know CAPS was screaming, I meant to emphasize.

“..So the Pope isn’t a Christian?...”

what is your definition of Christian???

“...Creationism is popular among the less educated segments of America and in the Islamic world. The majority of the Christian world has no use for it....”

This shows ignorance on your part, many scientist believe in Creationism.
I can list several. Because they don't agree with you does NOT make them wrong.

“...Because creationism is useless.....”

Why?

“... And screaming and shouting and crying about it isn’t going to change the FACT that humans and chimpanzees are more similar to eachother in DNA (in genes and across the entire genome) than either is to a gorilla.....”

A chimp is still a chimp? what is your point??

You cannot change facts, you simply ignore them (like evilutionist) or accept them.

“.. But using caplocks and crying and screaming irrationally might make you feel better about being ignorant of the facts.....”

See, you're wrong again, I am not irrational.
Nor am I screaming (as stated in opening remarks)
Nor am wrong about the facts, There are facts and there are “lies” to which are you refering???

Thanks for your Reply

239 posted on 12/13/2012 12:25:54 PM PST by kimtom (USA on the Brink, Now Falling over the edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: kimtom
Someone who accepts Jesus as their savior is a Christian. The Pope is not just a Christian, he is also the leader of about a billion Christians, and a renowned Biblical scholar.

It is a fact that the less educated someone is the more likely they are to be a creationist - and that creationism is not popular anywhere else but in the Islamic world. A few scientists that you can list that believe in creationism is anecdotal evidence and does nothing to erase the overwhelming trend that the less educated someone is the more likely it is that they are a creationist.

Creationism is useless because it leads to no further discovery or prediction. It is an ‘answer’ that leads nowhere.

A chimp is still a chimp. And when you look at the DNA of a chimp and compare it to a human and a gorilla - the chimp is more similar in DNA to a human than it is to a gorilla. That is a fact and a reality that you can either deal with or not.

“evilution?” How cretarded.

What explanation are you going to use to describe how differences in human populations came about? What theory is going to explain why we need a different flu shot every year? What explanation are you going to utilize to understand and predict how antibiotic resistance arises within populations of bacteria that plague humans?

How do you explain how all present species arose from those few ‘kinds’ that could fit on the Ark? Do you think all species of rats and mice arose from a rodent ‘kind’?

Thanks. I will pray for you.

240 posted on 12/13/2012 2:01:37 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson