Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lastchance

I am not optimistic because my conservative friends can only argue about their Biblical principles and NOT the case law...

I have been saying this for years about Reynolds v. United States.


36 posted on 12/08/2012 9:02:41 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood

I would have to look at that case. I don’t think marriage should only be argued on Biblical principle. I often argue as to why the State should give special status to the union of one man to one woman which is supposed to be for life and for the rearing of children. That this status came after the natural inclination to form such unions. That marriage is a natural right not a civil right and the place of government is to not create unions that define marriage but to protect marriage as it has been known throughout history and most cultures.


37 posted on 12/08/2012 2:23:17 PM PST by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson