Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL
Beyond that, you get into who should really pay for people that cannot otherwise take care of themselves. If they were kids, then the parents are expected to pay their way, particularly if the parents are making money. So why not flip that around and have the well-off kids help out a bit (as Tiger is doing)? If the older person needs help, track down his family and if they have resources, then they should pony-up.

This is what I have been looking for. Some solutions that recognize that the vice we are in crushes on both ends, young and old. I suspected that you were more reasonable than you were letting on. It did not go unnoticed that you didn't try to straw man or ad-hominem me into silence. I don't have a problem with the solutions you proposed.

137 posted on 12/09/2012 6:29:39 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

I like that idea.


138 posted on 12/09/2012 6:30:55 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

Thanks Tiger, I kind of suspected that you were being open-minded also. I see the age of older people living on their own as only a luxury that a very wealthy country can afford...and we had it, but then blew it (thanks to liberalism). We simply aren’t that wealthy anymore, so we are very likely to end up that way...I would just like to get there on our terms, rather than the on the terms of China or the IMF.


139 posted on 12/09/2012 6:34:48 PM PST by BobL (You can live each day only once. You can waste a few, but don't waste too many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson