I would agree the article is unfocused, but your comments are still shallow and meaningless, therefore their snarkiness is just snarkiness, and they do not advance the conversation intellectually. Snark, with an intellectual point, is powerful. Otherwise, it’s just snark.
You know, like your stupid comment about banning commenters like you. I don’t want to do that, I rather enjoy using superior snark to expose the intellectual bankruptcy of such commenters.
Then why is David Spade rich?