Which is all most of us can do. Unfortunately, many corporations put heavy pressure upon their employees to contribute "their fare share". As you may know, UW knows there are donors like you out there so they changed their pledge cards in the early 1990s to allow donors to "direct" their funds soley to 1 charitable organization like BSA. Of course, it is a "shell"/ confidence game red herring. The UW chapters already know how much (% of the "take") they are going to contribute to their qualified recipient non-profit organizations.
Which is all most of us can do. Unfortunately, many corporations put heavy pressure upon their employees to contribute "their fare share". As you may know, UW knows there are donors like you out there so they changed their pledge cards in the early 1990s to allow donors to "direct" their funds soley to 1 charitable organization like BSA. Of course, it is a "shell"/ confidence game red herring. The UW chapters already know how much (% of the "take") they are going to contribute to their qualified recipient non-profit organizations.
Exactly. My organization has a very strong 100% giving goal. Even if it's only a buck they want everyone to give something to United way.
I basically laugh in their face and tell them I will not contribute to faggot organizations.
They say "but you can direct your contribution to BSA"
But even if you direct your contribution to BSA some small part of that goes for UW overhead, which ends up supporting faggots.
I've not given anything to UW since they cut off BSA the first time. Then I learned who they really support. The entire organization and everyone who works for them (UW that is) can die for all I care. The world would be a much better place
(BTW, I'm proud to ruin my organization's 100% goal!)
Which is all most of us can do. Unfortunately, many corporations put heavy pressure upon their employees to contribute "their fare share". As you may know, UW knows there are donors like you out there so they changed their pledge cards in the early 1990s to allow donors to "direct" their funds soley to 1 charitable organization like BSA. Of course, it is a "shell"/ confidence game red herring. The UW chapters already know how much (% of the "take") they are going to contribute to their qualified recipient non-profit organizations.
Exactly. My organization has a very strong 100% giving goal. Even if it's only a buck they want everyone to give something to United way.
I basically laugh in their face and tell them I will not contribute to faggot organizations.
They say "but you can direct your contribution to BSA"
But even if you direct your contribution to BSA some small part of that goes for UW overhead, which ends up supporting faggots.
I've not given anything to UW since they cut off BSA the first time. Then I learned who they really support. The entire organization and everyone who works for them (UW that is) can die for all I care. The world would be a much better place
(BTW, I'm proud to ruin my organization's 100% goal!)
I was subject to such pressure. They didn't care about the dollar amount, they wanted 100% of the officer group to set the example for giving. I told them I would not give a penny to UW because it funds planned abortions.
Fortunately, I wasn't alone. I never gave the 'rah - rah' speach to the team either. You cannot compromise on values and principles.