Per the link below, and interview with Crump, about his Dee Dee conversation is part of the state’s evidence.
I’m no lawyer, but it seems that the door is wiiiide open to ask for the Dee Dee tape.....rather than just listening to Crump’s second hand (third hand?) account.
I’m new in my law school career, but with regards to the discovery process, I don’t even think the courts allow to admit a third hand account. A lawyer’s interpretation of the an interview with a third party would be considered work product, if I’m not mistaken. However, maybe since Krump is not actually involved in this trial from a legal standpoint, then they could admit his testimony regarding the DeeDee interview.
Either way, I’m pretty sure if they are going to use the DeeDee evidence, that have to provide the actual conversation to the defense team, and not just Krump’s account.