Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stunner: California’s cap-and-trade on track to deliver 14% of promised revenue in first auction
Hot Air ^ | December 11, 2012 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 12/11/2012 5:17:26 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Just think — if Democrats win the midterm elections in 2014, we could see this kind of success on a national scale!  California has struggled with massive budget deficits for years, but the political class in Sacramento stumbled on the perfect solution to falling revenues and rising costs … soaking the business world to seize more capital for further spending.  The state held its first auction of cap-and-trade credits, and projected that businesses would spend a billion dollars in buying, er, vapor.  Those projections were just a teensy bit optimistic, as Bloomberg’s Steven Greenhut explains:

In late November, the California Air Resources Board held its first of these auctions, in which businesses such as oil refineries and utilities bid for credits that allow them to emit greenhouse gases. They must cut back their production or buy enough credits to cover all their emissions. Statewide emission caps will drop each year as California pushes businesses to produce fewer greenhouse gases or pay more to buy the declining number of credits for auction in this newly created government “marketplace.”

That is the plan anyway. “First cap-and-trade auction a bust for California budget,” read the headline in the Sacramento Bee. Budget planners expected that the state would receive $1 billion from the sale of credits, but the 2013 credits went for a low price and there was little demand for 2015 credits. As the Bee story explained, “The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates that if trends hold in the February and May auctions, the state may only raise about $140 million in the first year.”

So they’re on track to miss their target by only 86%.  Some people might consider that a failure, but in California, that $140 million will fund eleventy-billion dollars in new spending.  Winning!

As if to prove my point, Governor Jerry Brown wanted the proceeds to fund the high-speed rail project that California has begun, which will transport people from Bakersfield to somewhere near Fresno, two places people love to leave but don’t want to arrive.  Even at the rate of income projected by the geniuses in Sacramento, it would take 100 years of cap-and-trade sales to fund that project without taking interest payments into account.  At the rate of actual sales, it would take 714.28 years.

Of course, there might not be many people to move between Fresno and Bakersfield by that time:

While they count on money from the auctions, California officials have imposed new costs on businesses, raised utility rates and put the state’s industrial products at a competitive disadvantage so that it can set an example for the world on how to reduce global temperatures. Democratic officials argue that the new green-energy model will energize the state’s business climate, but even the Air Resources Board admits that the state will suffer from what it terms jobs “leakage.”

The “leakage” might be a “floodage,” according to Dave Roberts, who reports for the website CalWatchdog. A study sponsored by pro-business groups estimates that the state will have 262,000 fewer jobs in 2020 because of the climate-change law. Roberts also cited a Boston Consulting Group finding that as many as 51,000 jobs might be lost due to refinery closings alone. California farmers and food processors are concerned that the rising state-mandated production costs will cause job losses as low-cost Chinese and Mexican processed-food imports take some of their business.

Leakage.  Job destruction is more like it.  Seizing capital from businesses in order to fund a government that hasn’t been able to accurately project a budget since the Los Angeles Dodgers were last in the World Series isn’t exactly a model for growth.  The cap-and-trade system imposed by California will necessarily hike energy costs, as businesses pass along the burden to consumers, and energy producers will continue their exodus from the Golden State.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: agw; ca; carbontax; democrats; envirofascism; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenfraud; obama; thegreenlie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2012 5:17:35 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

that much? that is unexpected. I was thinking single digits.


2 posted on 12/11/2012 5:18:31 PM PST by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp

fyi


3 posted on 12/11/2012 5:18:59 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Fred Nerks; Carry_Okie; blam; Lorianne; Twotone; bigbob; ...

Well,....the fat cat politicians were expecting 150%,....cause the climat is so nice out here.


4 posted on 12/11/2012 5:27:18 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Cap and Trade legislation reaks of Enron. We all know how that worked out.


5 posted on 12/11/2012 5:29:43 PM PST by Cyclone59 (Obama is like Ron Burgundy - he will read ANYTHING that is on the teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Philosophically, how is this different from the Pope selling indulgences?


6 posted on 12/11/2012 5:34:15 PM PST by null and void (Going Galt: The won't of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Did someone mention Enron?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpEcPFSEIwQ

As far as cap and tax goes, I think money is secondary to the ultimate goal which is to completely control the people.


7 posted on 12/11/2012 6:00:10 PM PST by Hayride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

why don’t they build a Bullet Train to Texas?

The state —in which I’m sitting— would get their stupid train nobody wants, and soon-to-be-former residents would get a final reminder of why they don’t want to live there anymore.


8 posted on 12/11/2012 6:00:20 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Interesting.
But I was more intrigued by the companion piece regarding Obamacare:"Quality Software Services, Inc. (QSSI), was awarded the contract to build the federal data hub and other technological components of the federal exchange early this year. It was then bought by UnitedHealth Group, which also owns UnitedHealthcare...Industry experts and competitors (snip) worry quite reasonably that if an insurance carrier which is supposed to compete inside the exchange shares an owner with the company building that exchange, that might turn out pretty darn well for…UnitedHealthcare.

Surprisingly enough, United Health Care is an off-shoot /partner with AARP, a strong supporter of Obamacare.

9 posted on 12/11/2012 6:00:40 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
La, la, la,
La, la, la...

Sigh. Didn't work.
If only I could be oblivious.

10 posted on 12/11/2012 6:23:49 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party: advancing indenture since 1787.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"They must cut back their production or buy enough credits to cover all their emissions."

Please, let them "cut back production". If constant brown-outs and huge increases in utility rates, economic failure and job losses are what it is going to take to wake people up in California, then let it happen. Let Californians suffer from the choices they made at the polls.

And I am truly sorry that Free Republic and it's creators would also be on the receiving end of the Liberal/DemocRAT Party imposed adversity and lunacy. Perhaps they can find a way to get out of the state in the near future.

11 posted on 12/11/2012 6:30:38 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They have already spent many times that in anticipation


12 posted on 12/11/2012 6:31:52 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They have already spent many times that in anticipation


13 posted on 12/11/2012 6:37:56 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Have Republicans been blamed yet? That’s the important thing. Blame is job #1.


14 posted on 12/11/2012 6:40:18 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

International redistribution, from us to them


15 posted on 12/11/2012 6:47:13 PM PST by ronnie raygun (bb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Interesting parallel. And, I like your tagline.

Its a Twofer!


16 posted on 12/11/2012 6:51:07 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

...as many as 51,000 jobs might be lost due to refinery closings alone.


California does not exactly have an excess of oil refineries. If refineries close, where is their gasoliine going to come from? and at what price?

Please pass the popcorn ... this is going to be fun to watch for those not living in the State.


17 posted on 12/11/2012 6:53:35 PM PST by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Obviously they just didn’t explain it well enough to the little people.


18 posted on 12/11/2012 6:56:43 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The create a problem; then sell the solution. Sounds like protection money being charged by the mob.


19 posted on 12/11/2012 6:59:11 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Witty saying goes here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Attention owners of small business in California: get out before the state hires Wesley Mouch, a bureaucrat who cripples the economy with endless regulations.


20 posted on 12/11/2012 7:00:12 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson