'Dehumanizing’ Gays? Scalia Defends His Views on Banning Gay Marriage During Princeton Speech

http://www.theblaze.com ^ | December 11, 2012 | Billy Hallowell

[NKP_Vet]

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Monday found himself defending his legal writings that some find offensive and anti-gay.

Speaking at Princeton University, Scalia was asked by a gay student why he equates laws banning sodomy with those barring bestiality and murder.

“I don’t think it’s necessary, but I think it’s effective,” Scalia said, adding that legislative bodies can ban what they believe to be immoral.

[NKP_Vet]

Damn, it would be great if we had a couple more Scalia's on the court. This is one of the smartest supreme court justices that has ever served. A liberal's nightmare.

[Travis McGee]

But it's perfectly okay to demonize white Christian men.

Imagine the below cartoonist's same style being turned against homosexuals, blacks, or another PC-protected group. It would never happen, and if it did, the cartoonist would be fired the same day.

But whites are fair game, in PC America.

This will not end well.

[Venturer]

If we agree to Homosexual marriage why do we not agree to polygamy, bestiality, incest or anything else a human being has a preference for as long as it is their own preference?

How can we protect children from pedophiles, why do we arrest prostitutes? If a woman decides to have an abortion can she not decide to rent her vagina? Why is it ok for women to be able to have control over maternity and not sexual intercourse for pay? Isn’t that also pro choice?

Why aren’t feminists screaming for the right to do what they want with their bodies pre conception, when they scream to do what they like after conception.

Why is it against the law to screw for money, but ok to kill their child?