The enviro-nazis are now going to use the Gorebull warming climate change fraud with Obama to try to stop KeystoneXL project.
1 posted on
12/16/2012 2:21:15 PM PST by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Obama is determined that this oil goes to Red China. So be it.
2 posted on
12/16/2012 2:25:31 PM PST by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
To: jazusamo
They may as well ask that the question of life after death be settled.
Or, do animals have souls, and if so; which species?
3 posted on
12/16/2012 2:25:50 PM PST by
cicero2k
To: jazusamo
4 posted on
12/16/2012 2:28:25 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, you've likely misread the situation.)
To: jazusamo
This project was DOA from day one.
5 posted on
12/16/2012 2:29:29 PM PST by
Carriage Hill
(Don't whiz on the electric fence. Awwwww-yeah!)
To: jazusamo
Let me guess. The “critics” want to conduct the “study” with government grants and want to take 5 to 10 years to complete it.
7 posted on
12/16/2012 2:37:47 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(It's not about the guns. It's about the control.)
To: jazusamo
Build the pipeling to within a few feet of the border in both directions. Build a giant fill station on the Canadian side and a giant dump area on the US side and let giant shuttle trucks take the crude across the border. SCREW the SOS!
8 posted on
12/16/2012 2:40:52 PM PST by
WellyP
(question!)
To: jazusamo
However, environmental groups say producing oil from Alberta tar sands releases more carbon dioxide than conventional drilling, which would increase global warming.. So these morons haven't figured out Canada will produce whether or not we have the XL pipeline?
12 posted on
12/16/2012 2:50:17 PM PST by
Mike Darancette
(I don't understand why the Boomers are so passive.)
To: thackney
14 posted on
12/16/2012 2:52:03 PM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: jazusamo; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.
Canada Ping!
20 posted on
12/16/2012 3:02:20 PM PST by
Squawk 8888
(True North- Strong Leader, Strong Dollar, Strong and Free!)
To: jazusamo
Why does Obama have the say in this?
21 posted on
12/16/2012 3:16:04 PM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: jazusamo
Keystone XL: K.I.A. 11/06/12. RIP
24 posted on
12/16/2012 3:47:51 PM PST by
clintonh8r
(Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
To: jazusamo
Let’s give them an ultimatum...open the pipeline or each and every one of us prepares and consumes a gallon of firehouse chili.
The resultant rise of greenhouse gases...methane predominantly...will (supposedly) cause the oceans to flood, set adrift their precious polar bears, and flood the socialist strongholds in California, and the East Coast.
A brief earth-burp of carbon dioxide or a nation-wide fart of doom? The choice, gentlemen, is yours.
To: jazusamo
My Global Warming Study for the Lake Champlain Basin. NY
“Lake Champlain smelt fishermen
who are wailing over lack of ice for
their shanties and indulging in other
piscatorial gnashing of teeth, can take
new heart.
There’s still plenty of time for
King Winter to get in his frigid licks,
and there have been only six years in
recorded history covering a period
of 120 years on Lake Champlain,
that the lake remained open [NOT FROZEN]. That
was in 1828, 1842, 1850, 1919, 1932
and 1933”
To: jazusamo
I remember the environmentalist whackos in the 1970s predicting the Trans Alaska Pipeline would surely turn Alaska into an oil soaked moonscape and decimate the caribou and other wildlife. They assured us that a pipeline could not be built over permafrost, over mountain ranges and earthquake faults and would have failure after failure. 40 years later the pipeline is working as designed and none of the dire predictions of environmental catastrophe have occurred. The XL pipeline is being built over prairie farmland that is geologically stable and is already crisscrossed by pipelines that have operated for decades without problems. The environmental concerns being raised are over blown and with pipelines already in the ground for 50 years operating without problems make those arguments almost ludicrous.
To: jazusamo
I remember the environmentalist whackos in the 1970s predicting the Trans Alaska Pipeline would surely turn Alaska into an oil soaked moonscape and decimate the caribou and other wildlife. They assured us that a pipeline could not be built over permafrost, over mountain ranges and earthquake faults and would have failure after failure. 40 years later the pipeline is working as designed and none of the dire predictions of environmental catastrophe have occurred. The XL pipeline is being built over prairie farmland that is geologically stable and is already crisscrossed by pipelines that have operated for decades without problems. The environmental concerns being raised are over blown and with pipelines already in the ground for 50 years operating without problems make those arguments almost ludicrous.
To: jazusamo
Supporters argue the project would help the United State lessen its dependency on foreign oil, create thousands of construction jobs and that it has already passed the environmental test.Tee-totally eleminate the Dept. of Energy. It has failed its mission in every conceivable way.
35 posted on
12/16/2012 8:39:17 PM PST by
houeto
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
37 posted on
12/16/2012 11:18:13 PM PST by
Don W
(There is no gun problem, there is a lack of humanity problem!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson