Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Right to Bear Arms
Peter M. Jennen

Posted on 12/19/2012 9:31:17 PM PST by horsappl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Ray76

Hell, I can’t afford ammo for a modern tank! What does it cost per shot, $500?
(Checked on some surplus ammo for a 40mm - costs $10 per round if you buy in bulk. No imagine what a 120mm DSFSDU round would cost...)
MIGHT be able to afford a couple of shots with a rocket launcher or bazooka... Some of the old HE or HEAT stuff is pretty cheap.


41 posted on 12/20/2012 8:31:19 AM PST by Little Ray (Get back to work. Your urban masters need their EBTs refilled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

The “and bear arms” part is good too. And clear. We can ‘keep’ them and when necessity arises we can ‘bear’ them. We don’t need permission to deal with threats. I am also very fond of “shall not be infringed.” For goodness sake the meaning of that is so clear any ten year old should be able to understand it with certainty. And I’m sure they would. Only an adult could play such mind games with such precise and efficient phrases.


42 posted on 12/20/2012 12:12:32 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

Agreed.


43 posted on 12/20/2012 8:41:51 PM PST by horsappl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
"followed by: if they can be armed like the military, why not tanks and bazookas...?"

One of the enumerated powers of Congress is to issue "letters of marque and reprisal" to privateers, authorizing them to attack enemy ships. Privateers were privately owned, heavily armed ships - probably one of the most powerful "weapon systems" of the 18th century. So yeah, why not a tank or bazooka, or a heavily armed ship?

44 posted on 12/20/2012 9:02:19 PM PST by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

REGULATE
control or maintain the rate or speed of (a machine or process) so that it operates properly: a hormone which regulates metabolism

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/regulate?q=regulated

Controlled militia or Maintained militia. “Maintained” is the logical usage in the context of the RKBA.

Thanks for pointing that out.


45 posted on 12/20/2012 9:06:28 PM PST by horsappl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

“You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916...We also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military’s changed.

We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.”

Barry’s right.I’m becoming a pirate.


46 posted on 12/21/2012 4:46:02 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson