[nonsporting]

Listen, I can’t recall a single teacher that I had at anytime that was intimidating, could be intimidating, had the presence of someone who could and would kill you on the spot or anything of the sort.

Appearances can be deceiving. Your experiences are not necessarily mine or others.

If some liberal state wants to tax its citizens into oblivion to pay for this monstrosity, let them. Other states can try other solutions.

Mass shooters are cowards. They don't want any opposition. They commit suicide when they discover rescue personnel on their way. The "possibility" of an armed teacher or admin will be enough to discourage most of the crazies. (See Lott & Landis study on Multiple Victim Public Shootings, Bombings, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handgun Laws)

[Spktyr]

Bookmark for later.

[chris37]

“Possibility” and “most” are risks that I am not willing to take.

As I said, if money is more important to you, then expect this to happen again.

Let the schools charge the parents for cost of increased security.

If public schools can’t afford to protect children, then don’t send children there.

It all boils down to what is more important to the parent, we are talking about their treasure after all.

What happens when you leave treasure undefended or inadequately defended?

It gets taken from you.