[MHGinTN]

Following the usual liberal gnashing of guns and the right to protect yourself, the question posed to gun banners should be, 'Would you rather the crazy in CT was a chemistry or biology expert, so he could kill children with a bomb placed in their midst, or a diesease package spewed upon them during a fire drill?

The point of coutrse being that crazies are going to kill with whatever means they can muster proficiency using. I'm no longer tolerant of fools who will accept that their money is so important that their bank must have secuirty protection, but the children they've sired should be placed in 'gun free zones' where they are easy targets for slaughter.

When the damned liberals address the wholesale slaughter of more than a million alive children via liberal supported and promoted abortuaries, then I'll discuss securing other areas on this planet. Until then, I'll remained armed and ready to opposed those who choose to destroy life and property, even other people's lives and/or property.

And I'm learnign to hate democrats and the enemy media who hype this idiocy of the left as if it was 'wisdom of the ages.' Sorry, fools, my tolerant quota is overdrawn now.

[tacticalogic]

'Would you rather the crazy in CT was a chemistry or biology expert, so he could kill children with a bomb placed in their midst, or a diesease package spewed upon them during a fire drill?'

Something like "the next Bill Ayres"?